The Study of Racialism Forum Index
The Study of Racialism
Discussion of U.S. Racialism
Please read The Rules before posting.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch     RegisterRegister 
   Log inLog in 
'

MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Improving U.S. Society
Author Message
oevega
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 04 May 2005
{Posts: 2021 }
Location: santiago, chile

PostPosted: Sat 05 Nov 2005 22:19    Post subject: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

Hi,

Once in a white I look for bigots in the net and I send them personal e-mails. My especiality is anti-Hispanic bigots. In those adventures I have reached several well known racists, and we have started certain weird dialogs.

What I am looking for? Well, I am interested in the origin of racism so I study bigots like a biologist study rats in a lab.

I always try to use psycological tactics to prove they are wrong or to show what they really are. And even with my poor English once in a while I have obtained certain interesting descriptions of those bigots.

I wrote this fellow because I read an article of him in the anti-hispanic e-zine called VDARE. It was about how little important hispanic culture was.
So I decided to contact him to know what kind of individual is him.

Look at my dialog with Sailer and you'll find out he recognized there are intelligent Hispanics. So he proved his thesis about the lack of potential of Hispanics in the U.S. to be rown. The suppossed lack of intelligence of Hispanics was shown wrong by himself. So he is a very stupid man, indeed.

You have there his e-mail if you want to start a new dialog to study that rat.

In the future, if you are interested, I will publish another of these dialogs with more well known American racists.


Regards.

Omar Vega

----------------
My first e-mail
-----------------
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:32:05 -0800 (PST)
From: "omar vega" <oevega@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Latin American Immigration Unlikely to Spark A New Renaissance
To: steveslr@aol.com


Steve:

I doubt about addressing you in English because you
might think I am a retarded, because I don't use your
language as an English native speaker. However,
because I think you can't read Spanish either I'll do
it in your terms.

The thing that motivates this letter is your article
called:

"Latin American Immigration Unlikely to Spark A New
Renaissance"

Is the most stupid thing I have read in years. It just
show how ignorant you are of Latin culture. If you
need better sources of information that the ones you
got, just let me know. I'm willing to teach you some
important things about the hispanic world that surely
will change the way you see our world.

Some of your mistakes are:

* Contributions to science, measured in Nobel price
science winners only: South America 4, Hispanic world
is about 8. For example, the discoverer of the ozono
hole is Mexican. So, the hispanic world compares very
well to some other areas like Asia. Of course we won't
have as many as the US. You got something we don have
... as yet: MONEY.

* You mentioned hollywood and Silicon Valley. Well the
hispanic actors and directors have been very common in
Hollywood, from Antony Queen, to Banderas, Rita
Hayworth and Rachel Welch. At this moment there is
plenty of Latin researchers in the US. Not all of them
are employees. Some employ gringos as well.

* Do you know Gaudi, Picasso, Alvarez? Well all of
them were hispanics.

* Do you know Fangio, Fitipaldi, Piquet and Senna? The
F1 race winners, they were (or are) hispanics too.

* Colombus and Seneca were hispanics.

So, my dear friend. I will use a frase in Spanish for
you.

Antes de seguir hablando lavate el hocico con jabon!!!

(Before continue talking wash you mouth with soap!!!)

So. If you want to LEARN study. I might help if you
wish. But I think is not a good idea to show your
ignorance to the whole world. That reinforce the
stereotype of the IGNORANT GRINGO.

And don't tell me you don't understand my poor
English.

Regards,

Omar Vega,
Proud to be an hispanic.

-----------------------------------
SECOND MAIL AFTER SAILER IGNORED ME
-----------------------------------

Hola Steve:

Please read it carefuly.

Lei su articulo:

"Latin American Immigration Unlikely to Spark A New
Renaissance"

Encuentro que usted esta muy desinformado. Su trabajo
refleja falta de educacion. Para demostrar su tesis,
de que nuestra gente es estupida, debiera leer en
Español. Los lenguajes barbaros como el suyo no tienen
mucha informacion al respecto. En efecto, existe un
sinnumero de aportes latinoamericanos que usted, y sus
amigos de piel rosadita, desconocen.

Hey. If you don't know Spanish, how come you pretend
to know so much about us. Smile

Regards,

Omar Vega

Quote:

-----------------------------
HERE I GOT THE ANSWER OF HIM
------------------------------

In a message dated 1/24/2005 3:31:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, oevega@yahoo.com writes:
Encuentro que usted esta muy desinformado.

Actually, I used the most detailed, quantitative database ever assembled on scientific and cultural achievement.

Best wishes,
Steve

-------------------
BUT I INSISTED
--------------------

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:10:36 -0800 (PST)
From: "omar vega" <oevega@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Re: about your article: "Latin American Immigration Unlikely to Spark A New R...
To: SteveSlr@aol.com


Well,

As you can see, we got sense of humour Smile However, I
don't share nor believe in your analysis.

However I will comment something. You Americans should
thanks God that most Latins going to the states are
the dumb ones. If the top Latinos migrated at the same
rate. Well, then competition in the States will be
harder than with chineses.

I tell you. I beat chineses in my graduated studies in
Canada. And I am a common, quite mediocre Latin,
unlike the genious I usually see in my country.
However, for North American standards, I am a nerd Smile

Regards,

Omar Vega

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
And THIS was his answer. Read it carefully. See how he avoided conflict
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: SteveSlr@aol.com Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:14:58 EST
Subject: Re: about your article: "Latin American Immigration Unlikely to Spark A New R...
To: oevega@yahoo.com


In a message dated 1/24/2005 4:17:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
oevega@yahoo.com writes:

You Americans should
thanks God that most Latins going to the states are
the dumb ones. If the top Latinos migrated at the same
rate. Well, then competition in the States will be
harder than with chineses.


That's true. I remember two Mexicans in my MBA class who just killed
my team in a marketing simulation competition. We had the second
best team but they just blew us out of the water.

Steve


Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:48:18 -0800 (PST)
From: "omar vega" <oevega@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Re: about your article: "Latin American Immigration Unlikely to Spark A New R...
To: SteveSlr@aol.com

------------------------------------------
Here is my repply with a piossonous tactic
------------------------------------------

Hi Steve,

Well Sir, we agree in something Smile
If you need any data about Latin America I will be
glad to give it to you. Including the long list of
genious we have Smile

Just let me show a page about Latin America you may
find interesting. It is called "Juan Valdez does not
live here anymore" (perhaps because he migrated to the
USA Smile. Of course is biased, I wrote it myself Smile

http://www.geocities.com/cirogyra/vega/juansnothere.htm

As a homework, I bet you'll never guess from what
country I am from Smile

Regards Amigo Smile

Omar Vega

---------------------------------------------------
He did not reply so I went for him to kill the bull.
----------------------------------------------------


Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: "omar vega" <oevega@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Some questions
To: steveslr@aol.com


Hi Steve,

I got a some questions for you.

Why do you HATE us so much?
Do you know us?
Have you make the effort to study us?
Do you know our culture and our achievements?
Do you know Latin America beyond Tijuana?
Do you know our dreams and feelings?
Are you afraid of us?

I am a Chilean from South America. Therefore I am a
Latin who feel sad because of the hate my people
suffer in the United Stated.

And I wonder why people like you keep the hate alive.

Regards,

Omar Vega,
Chilean,
(Hispanic, Latino, brown)



-----------------------
And he showed his agenda
-----------------------

From: SteveSlr@aol.com Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:17:26 EDT
Subject: Re: Some questions
To: oevega@yahoo.com


Would you want millions of Americans to move illegally to _your_ country?

-------------------------
A new mail.
------------------------

Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: "omar vega" <oevega@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Re: Some questions
To: SteveSlr@aol.com


Hi,

Well, lots of Peruvians do. They got less education
that we have? They are poor and not as much
"civilized" as we are. And they are darker than us.

But we know they are human being and have potential.

What should we do? Close the frontier? Send them to
the U.S.?

Regards,

Omar Vega

--------------------------------------------------------------
He did not answered so I tried again from other point of view
--------------------------------------------------------------

This message is not flagged. [ Flag Message - Mark as Unread ]

Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: "omar vega" <oevega@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Re: Some questions
To: SteveSlr@aol.com


Hi Steve,

--- SteveSlr@aol.com wrote:

> Would you want millions of Americans to move
> illegally to _your_ country?
>

It would depend of the kind of American we receive in
here. If they are decent hard working people, why not?
We are a country three times the size of Japan with a
tenth of the people. There is room in here.

Believe it or not some are comming.

Regards,

Omar Vega

-------------------------
There was no more answers
-------------------------


End of the series of E-mails.

Omar Vega
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2652 }

PostPosted: Sun 06 Nov 2005 14:11    Post subject: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

A few things Sailer touches on on his writing that people want to ignore, preferring to focus on his bigotry:

1. Illegal immigration is illegal. People who feel their people have the right ot be here illegally are in countries like Mexico that protect their own borders with other Latin American countries.

2. Importing large numbers of poor and uneducated people increases inequality and drives down the wages of the poor who are already here.

3. . This is my observation. The demand of some Latin American immigrants living in the U.S., like Jorge Ramos, that we (the we being everyone from heterosexual white males to recent immigrants) speak Spanish, accommodate their culture, and accept the inevitability of this, smacks of linguistic and cultural chauvinism. Many non-Spanish-speaking immigrants and native-born people actually resent this (speaking from personal experience and observation).

I’ve been in situations in stores, etc., where people who could speak English demanded that salespeople speak Spanish.

4. In some cases (south Florida and southern Calirfornia), we may be importing Latin America's racial attitudes, specifically, their colorism combined with their cultures' reluctance to disguss these things openly and honestly.
Back to top
oevega
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 04 May 2005
{Posts: 2021 }
Location: santiago, chile

PostPosted: Sun 06 Nov 2005 17:06    Post subject: Re: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

Hi G-Man,

Well, I assume that you are not defending Sailer bigotry againts Latinos.

Actually, the only thing I was defending is the contribution of the Iberia and Latin America to world history. After all our people have contributed quite a lot to this common goal of developing the human race. And I will not accept other oppinions in that issue.

Now, let get to that another topic which is the illegal immigration to the U.S. And let's see if we agree about it or not.

G-Man wrote:
A few things Sailer touches on on his writing that people want to ignore, preferring to focus on his bigotry:

1. Illegal immigration is illegal. People who feel their people have the right ot be here illegally are in countries like Mexico that protect their own borders with other Latin American countries.


I could argue about whom is the right to be where but I preffer not to open that can of worms.

You won't believe me but I agree with you in the point illegal immigration is a matter that has to be resolved by the host country. I had a very bad experience with Salvadorian immigrants while I lived in Canada, so I know that in between illegal immigrants there are also bad elements that crosses the frontiers.

In the case of my country, I would not like it to get crowded of Peruvians, Bolivians, Chineses or Nigerians of lower condition which they would only increase the criminality in here.

However, you should not forget that most of the European immigrants of the past that arrived to the U.S. were poor, uneducated people and that the movie "Gangs of New York" reflect very well the reality of living between those people in 19th Unites States.

Immigrants have always been a cause of trouble everywhere. Should we close all the frontiers in a globalized world?

Quote:
2. Importing large numbers of poor and uneducated people increases inequality and drives down the wages of the poor who are already here.


Only the poor and uneducated people is the one that want to migrate !!!
Why should the middle and upper classes migrate when they have better conditions back home?

Quote:
3. . This is my observation. The demand of some Latin American immigrants living in the U.S., like Jorge Ramos, that we (the we being everyone from heterosexual white males to recent immigrants) speak Spanish, accommodate their culture, and accept the inevitability of this, smacks of linguistic and cultural chauvinism. Many non-Spanish-speaking immigrants and native-born people actually resent this (speaking from personal experience and observation). I’ve been in situations in stores, etc., where people who could speak English demanded that salespeople speak Spanish.


The fact is most Hispanics in the U.S. speak English!
Actually, I find it understandable that those Hispanic people want to preserve Spanish. After all that is a fine language and it got a better pedigree than English.

You must realize as well that certain zones of the U.S. are of an international nature. Florida got a large Hispanic population and Miami is the virtual capital of the international Hispanic world. Because is closer to both Latin America and Europe, in there most of the Hispanic stars have their houses, and also several international companies that serve the Hispanic market have their main branches located there. Most of the customers speak Spanish.

Is any wonder that those customers demand to be addressed in Spanish?

And yes. There is a certain degree of Chauvinism in Spanish speakers. After all these is people that have detected the presence of hate against them from a long time ago. And Hispanics are a patient people that can wait for revenge but that always take it. Demanding people speak in Spanish perhaps is a way to relieve part of that tension. Don't you think so?

Quote:

4. In some cases (south Florida and southern Calirfornia), we may be importing Latin America's racial attitudes, specifically, their colorism combined with their cultures' reluctance to disguss these things openly and honestly.


What colorism? Latin Americans know very well your culture, and they have adapted to the American racism. Do you believe they are happy with "gringo" racism? Do you think they like "african" ethnocentrism?

No, Latinos discovered they will never be accepted by the gringo or black society, and they discovered they don't need to addapt anymore. Besides, in their crusade they have the moral support of their brothers of Europe and the Americas.

Yes. I believe there is a great future for Hispanics in the U.S. They are building it there right now, by themselves and alone.

Regards,

Omar Vega
Back to top
winwinkel
Guru
Guru


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 233 }

PostPosted: Mon 07 Nov 2005 06:53    Post subject: Re: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

oevega wrote:
G-Man wrote:

A few things Sailer touches on on his writing that people want to ignore, preferring to focus on his bigotry:

1. Illegal immigration is illegal. People who feel their people have the right ot be here illegally are in countries like Mexico that protect their own borders with other Latin American countries.


I could argue about whom is the right to be where but I preffer not to open that can of worms.


I think our Chilean friend is being coy "about whom is the right to be where [sic]." I think it is his own favorite can of worms.

oevega wrote:

However, you should not forget that most of the European immigrants of the past that arrived to the U.S. were poor, uneducated people and that the movie "Gangs of New York" reflect very well the reality of living between those people in 19th Unites States.


These people all entered the U.S.A. legally, I think. They were not illegal aliens. They duly came through customs and passed inspection by Immigration, through Ellis Island or wherever. Whether too many came too fast, or were the "wrong ethnicity," "un-assimilable" (most wanted to assimilate, I think) -- or not -- was an issue for U.S. Congressmen and presidents to take blame or credit for.

Our immigration problem now, clearly, is entirely Illegal immigration, which is illegal. And greatly aggravating the problem are people in countries like Mexico (also Chile and how many more?) who protect their own borders, but who feel their people have the right to enter or remain in the U.S. illegally!

oevega wrote:

Immigrants have always been a cause of trouble everywhere. Should we close all the frontiers in a globalized world?


It mixes-up different issues to bring up legal immigration or even "closed frontiers." The only issue is illegal immigration, which is a crime. We in the U.S. have no other immigration law or policy until we reassert control over the flow of illegal alien entry in violation of our country's borders. No "zones of the U.S. are of an international nature" abrogating our country's legal borders for the convenience of disrespectful, arrogant, disloyal, selfish or greedy illegal alien -- criminals. It violates federal U.S. criminal law. Illegal immigration is a crime -- in every country with borders and immigration laws.

Something to think about is how we U.S. citizens and legally entered aliens live without borders, we move freely across state-lines, we move about anywhere inside the U.S.A. freely. This same borderless freedom to move about and live rightfully where we choose doubtless would include Old Mexico and potentially other parts of Central, South America if our U.S. Constitution applied there. It would mean those sovereign nations south of the Rio Grande River must first be admitted as States to our United States Union. (Texas and Hawaii both had been sovereign nations prior to admission to the Union. Also, Texas, California and other states of the Southwest, and later the bottom portions of Arizona and New Mexico, which was purchased, had briefly been parts of Old Mexico before their admission to the U.S. as States.)

I am not sure where Mr. Oevega gets his cock-sure authority to speak for Mexicans or other Latin countries beside his own Chile? I do not presume to speak for Canadians or English or German peoples even though I have connections or relatives among them. Anyway, what would Mr. Oevega think of acquiring rights to enter and be in the U.S.A. legally by extending our Constitution's jurisdiction through annexation of new states, to Old Mexico, for example, or even Chile to become U.S. States?
George
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Mon 07 Nov 2005 07:54    Post subject: Re: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

G-Man wrote:
A few things Sailer touches on on his writing that people want to ignore, preferring to focus on his bigotry:

1. Illegal immigration is illegal. People who feel their people have the right ot be here illegally are in countries like Mexico that protect their own borders with other Latin American countries.

2. Importing large numbers of poor and uneducated people increases inequality and drives down the wages of the poor who are already here.

3. . This is my observation. The demand of some Latin American immigrants living in the U.S., like Jorge Ramos, that we (the we being everyone from heterosexual white males to recent immigrants) speak Spanish, accommodate their culture, and accept the inevitability of this, smacks of linguistic and cultural chauvinism. Many non-Spanish-speaking immigrants and native-born people actually resent this (speaking from personal experience and observation).

I’ve been in situations in stores, etc., where people who could speak English demanded that salespeople speak Spanish.

4. In some cases (south Florida and southern Calirfornia), we may be importing Latin America's racial attitudes, specifically, their colorism combined with their cultures' reluctance to disguss these things openly and honestly.


Contrary to popular beleif, the majority of latinos in this country are not illegal.
Back to top
oevega
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 04 May 2005
{Posts: 2021 }
Location: santiago, chile

PostPosted: Mon 07 Nov 2005 18:51    Post subject: Re: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

Hi George,

Here it is my answer

winwinkel wrote:
oevega wrote:
G-Man wrote:

A few things Sailer touches on on his writing that people want to ignore, preferring to focus on his bigotry:

1. Illegal immigration is illegal. People who feel their people have the right ot be here illegally are in countries like Mexico that protect their own borders with other Latin American countries.


I could argue about whom is the right to be where but I preffer not to open that can of worms.


I think our Chilean friend is being coy "about whom is the right to be where [sic]." I think it is his own favorite can of worms.


Yes. "SIC". I have to be sick to argue with you in English. lol.
However, you don't know Spanish (I guess) so let me try.


Quote:
oevega wrote:

However, you should not forget that most of the European immigrants of the past that arrived to the U.S. were poor, uneducated people and that the movie "Gangs of New York" reflect very well the reality of living between those people in 19th Unites States.


These people all entered the U.S.A. legally, I think. They were not illegal aliens. They duly came through customs and passed inspection by Immigration, through Ellis Island or wherever. Whether too many came too fast, or were the "wrong ethnicity," "un-assimilable" (most wanted to assimilate, I think) -- or not -- was an issue for U.S. Congressmen and presidents to take blame or credit for.


I don't know to whom they ask for permission. But anyways.


Quote:
Our immigration problem now, clearly, is entirely Illegal immigration, which is illegal. And greatly aggravating the problem are people in countries like Mexico (also Chile and how many more?) who protect their own borders, but who feel their people have the right to enter or remain in the U.S. illegally!


oevega wrote:

Immigrants have always been a cause of trouble everywhere. Should we close all the frontiers in a globalized world?


Quote:
It mixes-up different issues to bring up legal immigration or even "closed frontiers." The only issue is illegal immigration, which is a crime. We in the U.S. have no other immigration law or policy until we reassert control over the flow of illegal alien entry in violation of our country's borders. No "zones of the U.S. are of an international nature" abrogating our country's legal borders for the convenience of disrespectful, arrogant, disloyal, selfish or greedy illegal alien -- criminals. It violates federal U.S. criminal law. Illegal immigration is a crime -- in every country with borders and immigration laws.

Something to think about is how we U.S. citizens and legally entered aliens live without borders, we move freely across state-lines, we move about anywhere inside the U.S.A. freely. This same borderless freedom to move about and live rightfully where we choose doubtless would include Old Mexico and potentially other parts of Central, South America if our U.S. Constitution applied there. It would mean those sovereign nations south of the Rio Grande River must first be admitted as States to our United States Union. (Texas and Hawaii both had been sovereign nations prior to admission to the Union. Also, Texas, California and other states of the Southwest, and later the bottom portions of Arizona and New Mexico, which was purchased, had briefly been parts of Old Mexico before their admission to the U.S. as States.)


Too complex to me. Actually you should know what to do with illegals. I am only concern with Hispanics that are already there, most of which are legal.

Quote:
I am not sure where Mr. Oevega gets his cock-sure authority to speak for Mexicans or other Latin countries beside his own Chile?


Don't you know? I have access to information in Spanish and also to friends in Mexico. Most of the complains are in that language.

Quote:
I do not presume to speak for Canadians or English or German peoples even though I have connections or relatives among them. Anyway, what would Mr. Oevega think of acquiring rights to enter and be in the U.S.A. legally by extending our Constitution's jurisdiction through annexation of new states, to Old Mexico, for example, or even Chile to become U.S. States?
George


Actually, I never wanted to go to the US.

Regards.

Omar Vega[/quote]
Back to top
triguy
Superuser
Superuser


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
{Posts: 878 }

PostPosted: Tue 08 Nov 2005 08:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omar, you might want to be careful for saying that Steve Sailer is a racist. Frank doesn't believe that and suspended me for saying such.

What a lot of people don't realize is that illegal immigration has been encouraged by American businesses. Who picks the fruits and vegetables in the farm fields for subpar wages in a pesticide poisoned environment? Certainly not Johnny or Susie from Caucasian suburbia.

Are we really that naive to believe that if the Powers that be wanted illegal immigration stopped the border would have been sealed long ago? Read up on who are some of the biggest opponents of anti-illegal immigration legislation.

Furthermore, from a geopolitical stability stand point, what do you think Mexico, for example, would be like had the poor not had the escape hatch to America? Wouldn't it have been ripe for a Mexican version of the Shining Path? Think about that kind of situation at our southern border.

If you were an American leader during the Cold War watching Communist insurgents and Marxist terrorists launching guerrilla revolutions left and right, you don't think you'd be worried about a Mexico that has the same ingredients for trouble? What would you do ease the burden of the Mexican government? Wouldn't you look the other way to illegal immigration, especially if it served the immediate economic interests of different industries (and campaign contributors)?
Back to top
oevega
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 04 May 2005
{Posts: 2021 }
Location: santiago, chile

PostPosted: Tue 08 Nov 2005 18:32    Post subject: Hispanic culture Reply with quote

triguy wrote:
Omar, you might want to be careful for saying that Steve Sailer is a racist. Frank doesn't believe that and suspended me for saying such.

What a lot of people don't realize is that illegal immigration has been encouraged by American businesses. Who picks the fruits and vegetables in the farm fields for subpar wages in a pesticide poisoned environment? Certainly not Johnny or Susie from Caucasian suburbia.

Are we really that naive to believe that if the Powers that be wanted illegal immigration stopped the border would have been sealed long ago? Read up on who are some of the biggest opponents of anti-illegal immigration legislation.

Furthermore, from a geopolitical stability stand point, what do you think Mexico, for example, would be like had the poor not had the escape hatch to America? Wouldn't it have been ripe for a Mexican version of the Shining Path? Think about that kind of situation at our southern border.

If you were an American leader during the Cold War watching Communist insurgents and Marxist terrorists launching guerrilla revolutions left and right, you don't think you'd be worried about a Mexico that has the same ingredients for trouble? What would you do ease the burden of the Mexican government? Wouldn't you look the other way to illegal immigration, especially if it served the immediate economic interests of different industries (and campaign contributors)?


Hi Triguy,

I very much agree with you in all your points.Migration is a problem and it should not be necessary that people have to leave their countries in order to progress.

And you are right, Sailer might not be a "racist". He is just anti-Hispanic, which is a minor crime in America, I guess.

He said the Hispanic culture has nothing to contribe to the U.S. and that is precisely what those mails are about. He said Hispanic never had important people and had crontributed nothing to mankind. I mentioned all the genious we have since Seneca, and I would continue forever if he wanted to hear.

I prove him he was wrong. That's all.

Regards,

Omar Vega
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Wed 09 Nov 2005 00:11    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve is very much a Racist. He may intellectualize it, and if you want to get technical he is a racialist, but I also have emailed with him and he constanly posts criticism of any scientist that rebutts the concept of race.
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Wed 09 Nov 2005 03:12    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone who has done research on the internet on such topics as race, genetics, or interracial marriage may have directly or indirectly come across an infamous race researcher named Steve Sailer.

Who is Steve Sailer? He is one of a handful of extreme "scientific racists", affiliated with and often paid by extreme right-wing groups like VDare, American Renaissance, and others. He has written numerous pseudo-scientific articles on the internet that will fit his racist agenda that any race other than his own race, the White race, is inferior. He has a racist and condescending tone toward other races.

His falsified and racist writings have permeated the internet, creating many rumors and misunderstanding which have spread through many internet forums. Many unsuspecting people who have written articles on race or interracial marriages may have used Steve as a source while researching on the internet.

Steven Ernest Sailer is a white American male born in December 20, 1958. He attended UCLA in the early 1980s and worked for several years as a businessman in Chicago after college. In the late 1990s, he and his family (white wife Carole Sailer born 02/27/1959 and two sons) moved to his birthtown, Studio City, in the Los Angeles area where he currently resides.

It is the field of journalism, not as a businessman, which propelled Steve's publicity. Being a so-called race researcher who writes on and judges other races, and frequently condemns the non-white races as inferior and undeserving to live in America, it is only appropriate to ask, "What sort of experiences does Steve possess to research and judge other races?" He has no record of employment from the mainstream media, and he certainly has never been associated with Pulitzer winning publications or credible mainstream journalist organizations. He is not a doctor or scientist from an accredited institution in the field of race or genetics.

Possessing eloquent writing skills and a trashy attitude, Steve's first major employment debacle in journalism was for the National Review magazine, a far right-wing media publication infamously known for it's trashy, politically incorrect, borderline racist pieces of work. From 1994 to 1998, Steve wrote numerous inflammatory articles and excerpts on race and interracial marriages, primarily based on media stereotypes and his heinous group of extreme right-wing scientific racists (e.g. Phillipe Rushton, Sam Francis, the Pioneer Fund, Social Darwinists, etc...).

Once of his most (in)famous works for the National Review which boosted his publicity was the 1997 article on interracial marriages, "Is Love Colorblind". In the article, he believes Asian males and Black females are so inherently inferior and unattractive by birthright, they will be at a significant disadvantage in finding relationships and will be breeded out of society. This overexaggerated article was known to create gender divides among the races. Knowing the stir initially created by this article, he wrote another article in 2003 where he flat out lied about the 2000 Census stats on interracial marriages to repeat the havoc initially created so he can profit.

In the late 1990s, Sailer made two more accomplishments in the name of scientific racism. First, he created the Human Biodiversity Group, a right-wing eugenics thinktank where people with the mindsets of Steve Sailer can discuss and promote academic racism, homophobia, xenophobia, and eugenics policies. Among the worst members of the HBD group, whom Sailer Primarily bases his scientific research upon, are Charles Murray, Vincent Sarich, Arthur Jensen, John Derbyshire, Chris Brand, Philippe Rushton, Jim Woodhill, Steve Pinker, Jon Entine, and Peter Brimelow.

Second, Steve Sailer left the National Review to join the VDare internet publication. VDare is notorious for it's pro-fascist, anti-immigration stance and racist views to rid America of anyone who is not white. VDare's president, Peter Brimelow, declared the 1965 Immigration Act as "Hitler's revenge". As a note, VDare labels itself as a non-profit organization to avoid paying taxes and to give tax breaks to its contributors, but it profits anyway to employ exclusively right-wing biased journalists and racists so they can make a living.

Sailer's racist views and true colors became more prevalent after writing articles for VDare. Whether declaring that Latinos are no-good trash and Latino immigration must end, or that Blacks are genetically inferior in mental capability and do not deserve equal educational and economic opportunities, or that Asians are genetically inferior in physique and do not deserve opportunities in professional sports, Sailer has used VDare as his flagship to carry out his racist agenda of white supremacy and to trash on anyone who is not white like him.

Another less-than-plausible journalist achievement for Steve is joining the United Press International organization in 2001. Because writing articles under the VDare name was too conspicuous, the UPI seemed like a more neutral and acceptable logo at the time. However, a closer examination into UPI shows the same extreme right-wing bias.

The UPI, a subsidiary of the conservative Washington Times, is a 93-year-old agency which has been a financially troubled operation for the past three decades, with multiple ownership changes during the past 18 years. A major historical turning point of UPI was in 2000, when the Rev. Sun Myung Moon's media organization, News World Communications, purchased the Washington Times and UPI to extend his media regime to the international level. The Rev. Sun Myung Moon, who heads his Unification Church, is a cultist leader and extreme right-winger from Korea. He is known for starting an obsessive cult group, whom his followers are labeled Moonies, in America during the 1970s, and has been known to spread his ultra-conservative movement centered around him on an international level since then.

As you can infer, the UPI (also nicknamed the Unification Press International) exclusively employs right-wing biased journalists, including Steve Sailer.

Before you get offended with any of his writings, please keep in mind he is only a biased freelance writer. He is not a scientist or doctor from an accredited institution in the field of genetics or race. His livelihood depends on overexaggerating, even flat out lying, to create a stir among the public so he can profit and pay off his personal bills. Unfortunately, his countless writings on the internet has created much lies and discontent, and it is time to hold him accountable.
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2652 }

PostPosted: Wed 09 Nov 2005 16:03    Post subject: Re: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

Salsassin wrote:
G-Man wrote:
A few things Sailer touches on on his writing that people want to ignore, preferring to focus on his bigotry:

1. Illegal immigration is illegal. People who feel their people have the right ot be here illegally are in countries like Mexico that protect their own borders with other Latin American countries.

2. Importing large numbers of poor and uneducated people increases inequality and drives down the wages of the poor who are already here.

3. . This is my observation. The demand of some Latin American immigrants living in the U.S., like Jorge Ramos, that we (the we being everyone from heterosexual white males to recent immigrants) speak Spanish, accommodate their culture, and accept the inevitability of this, smacks of linguistic and cultural chauvinism. Many non-Spanish-speaking immigrants and native-born people actually resent this (speaking from personal experience and observation).

I’ve been in situations in stores, etc., where people who could speak English demanded that salespeople speak Spanish.

4. In some cases (south Florida and southern Calirfornia), we may be importing Latin America's racial attitudes, specifically, their colorism combined with their cultures' reluctance to disguss these things openly and honestly.


Contrary to popular beleif, the majority of latinos in this country are not illegal.


True and many, like Cesar Chavez, have roots in this country going back at least three generations.

I was referring specifically to illegal immigration and the belief promoted by some Latino activists, intellectuals, etc., that we should be speaking their language in this country.

Author Juan Gonsales along with Jorge Ramos are two people who believe that we would be better off accomodating members of their tribe linguistically and only members of their tribe. In other words, it isn't great to learn Kreyol or Tagalog in the U.S., just Spanish.
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Wed 09 Nov 2005 16:49    Post subject: Re: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

G-Man wrote:

True and many, like Cesar Chavez, have roots in this country going back at least three generations.

I was referring specifically to illegal immigration and the belief promoted by some Latino activists, intellectuals, etc., that we should be speaking their language in this country.

Author Juan Gonsales along with Jorge Ramos are two people who believe that we would be better off accomodating members of their tribe linguistically and only members of their tribe. In other words, it isn't great to learn Kreyol or Tagalog in the U.S., just Spanish.


But Spanish does have the historical backing of always having had a strong presence in many territories of US. When the US took over those lands it adopted that part of the culture. Think of Quebec in Canada.

Furthermore, the SPanish had a very strong role in the creation of this country, so I think Spanish does get credit. Not overriding English, but credit nonetheless.
Back to top
oevega
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 04 May 2005
{Posts: 2021 }
Location: santiago, chile

PostPosted: Sat 12 Nov 2005 12:59    Post subject: Re: MY PRIVATE MAILS WITH STEVE SAILER Reply with quote

Salsassin wrote:

But Spanish does have the historical backing of always having had a strong presence in many territories of US. When the US took over those lands it adopted that part of the culture. Think of Quebec in Canada.

Furthermore, the SPanish had a very strong role in the creation of this country, so I think Spanish does get credit. Not overriding English, but credit nonetheless.


Yes,

And a country like the U.S. get enriched knowing and speaking a language so noble like Spanish is. Some facts:

(1) Spanish is at the core of the so called Western Civilization. Spanish is nothing more than a simplified Latin, the language of the Romans. By comparison English is only a westernized language, introduced to the west by German barbarians.

(2) The U.S. is at this moment the SECOND largest Spanish speaking country in this world. In the U.S. there are more Spanish speaking people than in Spain.

(3) Is an important language spoken worldwide, and closely related to other Latin languages like Portuguese, Italian, Romanian and French, and also to Ladino, the language of the Spanish Jews in the diaspora.

(4) It carries a superb literature and culture which is unknown in the less sophisticated English literature. One that could enrich the minds of Americans quite a lot.

Regards,

Omar Vega
Back to top
William
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2005
{Posts: 1057 }
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Mon 14 Nov 2005 17:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omar wrote:
(1) Spanish is at the core of the so called Western Civilization. Spanish is nothing more than a simplified Latin, the language of the Romans. By comparison English is only a westernized language, introduced to the west by German barbarians.


Of course you will recall that the term "barbarian" as applied by Greeks and Romans to Celts and Germans was largely due to ignorance of their culture and advancements (the Gauls' invention of soap, for instance). Let's not forget that Romans practiced barbarism, too, with their conquests and gladiatorial events. Furthermore, ancestors of the Romans and Greeks, and indeed all Europeans, were once the type of people that Romans and Greeks would call barbarians. These barbarians brought the proto-Indo-European language to Europe.

The greatness of the Romans rests largely with the fact that they adopted the very best cultural aspects and inventions of people they conquered or came in contact with, barbarian or not.

Omar wrote:
(2) The U.S. is at this moment the SECOND largest Spanish speaking country in this world. In the U.S. there are more Spanish speaking people than in Spain.


This is true, but doesn't mean Americans should be forced to speak Spanish or post bi-lingual signs everywhere. The French spoken in Quebec has had a continuous and unbroken presence there for centuries, which solidifies its position. Spanish has also been spoken in southwestern U.S.A. for centuries, and thus has a solid position there. But in other parts of the country, where the influx of large numbers of Spanish-speakers has been recent, there is no reason non-Spanish-speakers should acquiesce to demands that they should post bilingual signs or speak Spanish. When my parents came here, no one posted German signs for them. My dad learned English by doing crossword puzzles, and my mom went to night school.

Omar wrote:
(3) Is an important language spoken worldwide, and closely related to other Latin languages like Portuguese, Italian, Romanian and French, and also to Ladino, the language of the Spanish Jews in the diaspora.


Yes, this is true, and there is nothing wrong with encouraging Americans to broaden their horizons, as it were, and learn another language. But they shouldn't be forced to learn Spanish if they'd rather learn something else.

Omar wrote:
(4) It carries a superb literature and culture which is unknown in the less sophisticated English literature. One that could enrich the minds of Americans quite a lot.


All peoples and nationalities have distinct cultures and peculiarities that could enrich every other nation. The Japanese culture is rich and laden with interesting aspects. Does this mean we should all learn to speak Japanese?
Back to top
oevega
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 04 May 2005
{Posts: 2021 }
Location: santiago, chile

PostPosted: Tue 15 Nov 2005 22:38    Post subject: Barbarians and Spanish Language Reply with quote

William wrote:
Omar wrote:
(1) Spanish is at the core of the so called Western Civilization. Spanish is nothing more than a simplified Latin, the language of the Romans. By comparison English is only a westernized language, introduced to the west by German barbarians.


Of course you will recall that the term "barbarian" as applied by Greeks and Romans to Celts and Germans was largely due to ignorance of their culture and advancements (the Gauls' invention of soap, for instance). Let's not forget that Romans practiced barbarism, too, with their conquests and gladiatorial events. Furthermore, ancestors of the Romans and Greeks, and indeed all Europeans, were once the type of people that Romans and Greeks would call barbarians. These barbarians brought the proto-Indo-European language to Europe.

The greatness of the Romans rests largely with the fact that they adopted the very best cultural aspects and inventions of people they conquered or came in contact with, barbarian or not.


Yes. I agree with you that Romans were a bunch of brutes. Like any other Ancient civilization, anyways. However, they develop a CIVILIZATION that barbarians admired. In that civilization Spain was a province from were many Emperors, Generals and Intelectuals came from.

Today, the descendents of the ancient barbarians are at the control room of the world, and they look down zones, like Latin America. So, it is a pleasure to remember the old "white" germanic peoples that they were barbarians once. And that they also used to enter the Roman Empire without visa, like certain poor peoples of today's "Barbarian South" do today.

Quote:
Omar wrote:
(2) The U.S. is at this moment the SECOND largest Spanish speaking country in this world. In the U.S. there are more Spanish speaking people than in Spain.


This is true, but doesn't mean Americans should be forced to speak Spanish or post bi-lingual signs everywhere. The French spoken in Quebec has had a continuous and unbroken presence there for centuries, which solidifies its position. Spanish has also been spoken in southwestern U.S.A. for centuries, and thus has a solid position there. But in other parts of the country, where the influx of large numbers of Spanish-speakers has been recent, there is no reason non-Spanish-speakers should acquiesce to demands that they should post bilingual signs or speak Spanish. When my parents came here, no one posted German signs for them. My dad learned English by doing crossword puzzles, and my mom went to night school.


"Were in Rome do what the Romans do".

It is curious but Spanish networks in the U.S. have lot of advertisements of English courses. Most Hispanics in the U.S. speak English and most latinos in Latin America want to learn. As the matter of fact one of the goals of my own country, Chile, is to become bilingual Spanish-English in one generation.

My point was not impose Spanish to the US. but just to say that Hispanics have have had some very bright minds. That's all.


Quote:
Omar wrote:
(3) Is an important language spoken worldwide, and closely related to other Latin languages like Portuguese, Italian, Romanian and French, and also to Ladino, the language of the Spanish Jews in the diaspora.


Yes, this is true, and there is nothing wrong with encouraging Americans to broaden their horizons, as it were, and learn another language. But they shouldn't be forced to learn Spanish if they'd rather learn something else.


Nobody should be forced. I agree.

Quote:
Omar wrote:
(4) It carries a superb literature and culture which is unknown in the less sophisticated English literature. One that could enrich the minds of Americans quite a lot.


All peoples and nationalities have distinct cultures and peculiarities that could enrich every other nation. The Japanese culture is rich and laden with interesting aspects. Does this mean we should all learn to speak Japanese?


I repeat. Nobody should be forced. And nobody should be look down either. That was why I deffended Hispanic culture and history. That's all.


Regards,

Omar Vega
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Improving U.S. Society All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group