|
|
| Author |
Message |
Patience Mentor

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 {Posts: 261 } Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri 18 May 2007 15:06 Post subject: What is "White"? |
|
|
It occurred to me from another discussion on this board that I would like to get some feedback on what "white" is. I know it is a social construct, but as such, what is it and what does it mean?
What is "white" for you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kalima Experienced User

Joined: 10 May 2007 {Posts: 138 } Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Fri 18 May 2007 15:52 Post subject: |
|
|
That's an interesting question. It's more than just phenotype, but it's not a specific culture. You can have white Germans and white Australians, white Americans and white Africans. We all recognize each other as white.
The reason I say it's more just a phenotype is that Blacks living in the US who subscribe to the ODR say it is. In the US, your culture and ancestry trumps your phenotype. They've in a sense removed themselves from what they see in front of them. It's a sort of doublethink.
So I guess my answer is I don't know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 5374 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Fri 18 May 2007 16:14 Post subject: |
|
|
I depends on who is using the word.
Americans who do not see themselves as being of mainly Euro descent (including some Hispanics, African Americans, Asian Americans, Jews, Native Americans, and Arab Americans) tend to use it to refer to mainstream English-speaking society in general and to anyone but themselves and Blacks in particular. For example, U.S. Congresswoman Corrine Brown (D-FL) famously told two Republican Mexican Americans, "All you White men look alike to me." Similarly, Blacks often refer to other minorities (Hispanics, Jews, Asian-Americans, etc.) as "White" when they want to convey opposition but as "people of color" when they want to indicate support. Another famous example is that the Native Americans engaged in warfare against the U.S. Army's 24th and 25th infantry, and the 9th and 10th cavalry referred to the enemy soldiers as "black White men."
On the other hand, Americans who see themselves as being of mainly Euro descent seldom apply the term to themselves. For example, when asked their "ethnicity" on the census long form, fewer than one USAmerican in 100 chooses "White." See http://backintyme.com/rawdata/ethnics.xls for details.
In general, it seems to be a term used nowadays only by White supremacists and by people who, at the moment of usage, do not consider themselves White and see "White" as "the opposition." Historically, of course, it has changed in meaning many times, usually referring to mainstream U.S. society, whatever that happened to mean at the time ("Christian" in the 1600s, "Protestant" in the 1700s, "Anglo-Saxon" in the 1800s, etc.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ImBack Suspended

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 {Posts: 630 }
|
Posted: Fri 18 May 2007 19:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | You can have white Germans and white Australians, white Americans and white Africans. We all recognize each other as white. |
That is because whiteness is founded in racial white supremacy, but the purpose it serves is to control and protect social status and political power for mainstream Americans, Australians, South Africans, and others. This idea that "we all recognize each other as white", is part of the problem.
Allow me to take it away from you. I am white too. Actually, so are perhaps 50 percent of those who America would define as Blacks. By what measure, you ask? By the fact that they too are mainstream, therefore they are white. But what about race, you ask? By the one drop rule of hyperdescent - one drop of white blood makes you white too.
Kid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kalima Experienced User

Joined: 10 May 2007 {Posts: 138 } Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Fri 18 May 2007 21:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| fwsweet wrote: | | In general, it seems to be a term used nowadays only by White supremacists and by people who, at the moment of usage, do not consider themselves White and see "White" as "the opposition." |
I don't know if it's more shocking to me that we seem to live on different planets, or that you just called me a white supremacist.
The only white people that I know of who DON'T check off the box 'white' are those who identify as Native American. (unless you want to throw out the social realities of the ODR in the US and call just about all those who identify as Black, 'white' and most of those who identify as Hispanic)
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kalima Experienced User

Joined: 10 May 2007 {Posts: 138 } Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Fri 18 May 2007 21:49 Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="TheMulattoKid"] | Quote: | | one drop of white blood makes you white too. |
Sure, you can look at it that way. I really don't care how someone else identifies themselves as long as they're honest about it, not pretending to be someone they aren't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
High School Teacher Mentor

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 {Posts: 255 } Location: California
|
Posted: Fri 18 May 2007 23:37 Post subject: Re: What is "White"? |
|
|
| Patience wrote: | It occurred to me from another discussion on this board that I would like to get some feedback on what "white" is. I know it is a social construct, but as such, what is it and what does it mean?
What is "white" for you? |
For me, calling oneself "white" is identifying with European ancestry. At an everyday, commonsense level, it is as simple as that. However, I think it was sagascend who mentioned the existence of an unofficial global racial hierarchy that still permeates our consciousness. So identifying oneself as "white" is laying claim to a privilege that only comes with being recognized as such.
Googling 'whiteness' I came across the following interesting paper by a law professor.
Constructing Whiteness |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kalima Experienced User

Joined: 10 May 2007 {Posts: 138 } Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Sat 19 May 2007 01:09 Post subject: Re: What is "White"? |
|
|
| High School Teacher wrote: |
Googling 'whiteness' I came across the following interesting paper by a law professor.
Constructing Whiteness |
This is very helpful, thank you.
To everyone: So if I understand this right, the very act of calling yourself 'white' is offensive? What should we call ourselves then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patience Mentor

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 {Posts: 261 } Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat 19 May 2007 11:23 Post subject: Re: What is "White"? |
|
|
| kalima wrote: |
To everyone: So if I understand this right, the very act of calling yourself 'white' is offensive? What should we call ourselves then? |
Kalima,
I don't call myself anything racial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 5374 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Sat 19 May 2007 11:37 Post subject: Re: What is "White"? |
|
|
| kalima wrote: | | So if I understand this right, the very act of calling yourself 'white' is offensive? |
Where did you get this idea from? Was it in that link? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kalima Experienced User

Joined: 10 May 2007 {Posts: 138 } Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Sat 19 May 2007 16:20 Post subject: Re: What is "White"? |
|
|
| fwsweet wrote: | | kalima wrote: | | So if I understand this right, the very act of calling yourself 'white' is offensive? |
Where did you get this idea from? Was it in that link? |
Yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patience Mentor

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 {Posts: 261 } Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat 19 May 2007 17:23 Post subject: |
|
|
In thinking about the concept of "white" I'm trying to figure out if there is anything left if superiority is taken out of the equation.
What is "white" if this is gone?
Can it be defined?
There's the European heritage, but why not just say European.
Is there a difference psychologically between saying 'I am "white" and 'I am of European Heritage?' What different images do these two sentences conjure up? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ImBack Suspended

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 {Posts: 630 }
|
Posted: Sat 19 May 2007 20:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| There is only one thing left, Patience. Mainstream. Oh, and Kalima, you are absolutley correct about what I am saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LMartin Regular User

Joined: 11 May 2005 {Posts: 84 } Location: New York
|
Posted: Sat 19 May 2007 21:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| Patience wrote: | In thinking about the concept of "white" I'm trying to figure out if there is anything left if superiority is taken out of the equation.
What is "white" if this is gone?
Can it be defined?
There's the European heritage, but why not just say European.
Is there a difference psychologically between saying 'I am "white" and 'I am of European Heritage?' What different images do these two sentences conjure up? |
Whiteness is the presumption of Constitutional freedoms. The Constitution defines the superior person, the truly liberated person, the ideal person. These freedoms were originally conceived by and for white males, and so retains a lot of that character. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ImBack Suspended

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 {Posts: 630 }
|
Posted: Sun 20 May 2007 05:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Yea Martin is correct. White is about being a mainstream American entittled to all of the social and legal priviliges under our constitution and traditonally granted to established Americans.
Kid |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patience Mentor

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 {Posts: 261 } Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon 21 May 2007 12:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| Thinking some more on the subject of colourizing....it's now anti-social and insulting to call a Native American person "red" and an East Asian person, "yellow" but "black" and "white" are still more than acceptable ways of categorization. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mixedmom Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 782 }
|
Posted: Mon 21 May 2007 13:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| Patience wrote: | | Thinking some more on the subject of colourizing....it's now anti-social and insulting to call a Native American person "red" and an East Asian person, "yellow" but "black" and "white" are still more than acceptable ways of categorization. |
This is a very keen observation! The more that I think about this, "black" and "white" should be considered inappropriate ways to describe human beings in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gemini072 Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 2942 }
|
Posted: Mon 21 May 2007 16:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| LMartin wrote: | | Patience wrote: | In thinking about the concept of "white" I'm trying to figure out if there is anything left if superiority is taken out of the equation.
What is "white" if this is gone?
Can it be defined?
There's the European heritage, but why not just say European.
Is there a difference psychologically between saying 'I am "white" and 'I am of European Heritage?' What different images do these two sentences conjure up? |
Whiteness is the presumption of Constitutional freedoms. The Constitution defines the superior person, the truly liberated person, the ideal person. These freedoms were originally conceived by and for white males, and so retains a lot of that character. |
All white males? I can go across this country and highlight whole communities of disenfranchised white men, white men & women who 'mainstream' white America would try to hide from and definately wouldn't like their sons & daughters to marry.
Saying that, I do agree with the definition you supplied. But even that applies to particular whites. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sagascend Moderator-at-Large

Joined: 17 Jun 2006 {Posts: 2404 }
|
Posted: Mon 21 May 2007 17:38 Post subject: |
|
|
| gemini072 wrote: | | LMartin wrote: | | Patience wrote: | In thinking about the concept of "white" I'm trying to figure out if there is anything left if superiority is taken out of the equation.
What is "white" if this is gone?
Can it be defined?
There's the European heritage, but why not just say European.
Is there a difference psychologically between saying 'I am "white" and 'I am of European Heritage?' What different images do these two sentences conjure up? |
Whiteness is the presumption of Constitutional freedoms. The Constitution defines the superior person, the truly liberated person, the ideal person. These freedoms were originally conceived by and for white males, and so retains a lot of that character. |
All white males? I can go across this country and highlight whole communities of disenfranchised white men, white men & women who 'mainstream' white America would try to hide from and definately wouldn't like their sons & daughters to marry.
Saying that, I do agree with the definition you supplied. But even that applies to particular whites. |
I agree, Ty. It was White men of the landed gentry or the intellectual elite that these freedoms were intended for, not the rest of us. The expansion of these freedoms, the application of them to the merchant class and poor Whites, non-Protestant and/or non-northern European Whites, "ethnic" people like Jews and Arabs and the like has been gradual. Yet the prototypical White American is still the WASP who can trace his family back to the UK or the Netherlands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pianoplayer111 Wizard

Joined: 16 May 2007 {Posts: 429 }
|
Posted: Mon 21 May 2007 18:30 Post subject: Re: What is White? |
|
|
In America, "white" is often interpreted to mean blue-eyed blond people. However, there are broader definitions of it. Some black folks and some white racists believe that it is impossible to have a brown-eyed, brown-haired white person without that person being "corrupted" by black blood. Some people feel that if a white person has curly hair or olive skin then that person is black. That is one example of the myth of racial purity in this country.
It is difficult to say what "whiteness" is. Some would say it is all about appearance or phenotype. Others would say no, it is about how you're treated by society on a whole. There is no real definition of whiteness or blackness in my mind. Here is what I've observed over the years, however:
-Most in America perceive "white people" to be those of discernible European/Caucasian ancestry. If you're a blue-eyed blonde, that helps. If you have straight hair, even better. If you happen to have dark hair or brown eyes you will mostly be seen as "nonwhite" despite any overwhelming European blood. I don't agree with this, but oh well...
-White people are often viewed as being socially dominant, the ones that all others aspire to emulate. Many minorities in America perceive whites as being the ones who reap all the benefits (i.e., white privilege) whether or not these whites are rich or poor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|