|
|
| Author |
Message |
Hanzou Mentor

Joined: 05 Nov 2005 {Posts: 261 }
|
Posted: Fri 30 May 2008 16:58 Post subject: Do "Light Skinned Blacks" Have It Easier? |
|
|
I found this wonderful topic on another forum. It comes from the horribly bad Tyra banks show. In this episode, Tyra does a program in which "dark skinned blacks" and "light skinned blacks" discuss the pain and hurt that coincides with colorism in the U.S. Here are links to the showl
Part1
http://www.imeem.com/people/3NyCHVT/video/ZbQLBait/tyra_banks_show_april_24_2008_do_light_skinned_blacks_h/
Part2
http://www.imeem.com/people/3NyCHVT/video/mH228c1X/tyra_banks_show_april_24_2008_do_light_skinned_blacks_h/
Part3
http://www.imeem.com/people/3NyCHVT/video/gqj3mZJC/tyra_banks_show_april_24_2008_do_light_skinned_blacks_h/
Part4
http://www.imeem.com/people/3NyCHVT/video/uxYvOZ_l/tyra_banks_show_april_24_2008_do_light_skinned_blacks_h/
Part5
http://www.imeem.com/people/3NyCHVT/video/4lwVmMFm/tyra_banks_show_april_24_2008_do_light_skinned_blacks_h/
This show illustrates one of my pet peeves when it comes to discussing colorism in the United States; the "light skinned blacks" are almost always the bad guys. The very title of this program illustrates this reality, because no one would ever dream that "dark skinned blacks" have it easier in general society.
Also its more acceptable in the black community to be proud of your "darkness", yet if you are proud of being lighter, you're automatically viewed with suspicion and raised eyebrows. Case in point, the young woman in this program who stated "the blacker the berry the sweeter the juice", or the man who stated that he prefers "dark skinned black women" to resounding applause from the audience. However, a woman who states that she favors her more mixed appearance (though she didn't look very mixed IMO) was demonized by the audience and by Tyra herself. I believe Tyra called the woman "The slave master's dream".
Programs like this are counterproductive to ending colorism in the US. Not only is it biased towards a certain segment of "black people", it also reinforces the ODR, and makes it seem like having European heritage of any known quantity is something to be ashamed of. Perhaps worst of all, it teaches an entire generation of mixed men and women who claim to be "light skinned black" that they must be the torch-bearers of black victimization in the US, and be the watchdogs of their identity if they intend to be willing participants in the "black" ideology. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Miller Wizard

Joined: 26 May 2007 {Posts: 425 } Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Fri 30 May 2008 17:18 Post subject: Re: Do "Light Skinned Blacks" Have It Easier? |
|
|
| Hanzou wrote: | | IThis show illustrates one of my pet peeves when it comes to discussing colorism in the United States; the "light skinned blacks" are almost always the bad guys. |
This is very evident in one of my favorite movies, A Soldier's Story. In most reviews of this movie, Master Sergeant Vernon Waters (played by the late Adolph Caesar), is described as a "light-skinned black" who looks down on "dark-skinned blacks" - when that wasn't the case at all. In fact, there was no mention of "skin color among blacks" in this movie, and the role of Sergeant Waters could have easily been played by a "dark-skinned black" man as well.
I think that a "light skinned black" man was cast for this role in order to give him a more villified appearance (personally, I thought that Sergeant Waters' desires and intentions were for the good of black people, it's only that his methods of achieving them were misguided). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 5380 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Fri 30 May 2008 17:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Funny. This was a topic of lively discussion after my lecture on Wednesday. The lecture was about The Perception of "Racial" Traits, but somehow the post-lecture discussion turned to U.S. colorism. The class never really resolved it, of course, but some interesting points made were:
1. As Richard suggests, it is politically correct nowadays to praise a deeper sub-Saharan phenotype and to denigrate a mixed phenotype. The reverse is politically incorrect.
2. The old colorism phrases ("If you're white you're all right, if you're brown stick around, if you're black get back.") are still quoted, but as an example of the bad old days rather than as serious behavioral teaching to the young.
3. Objective measurements (denial of opportunity, workplace discrimination, pay rate) show the opposite. The darker you are, the more likely you are to suffer discrimination. This is especially true in the entertainment industry, where mixed actors are much more likely to get hired.
4. The pro-dark, anti-mixed attitude that Richard saw on the Tyra Banks show was quite common in the antebellum north and upper south. On the other hand, the "ïf you're brown sitck around" attitude was the socially accepted norm in the lower (gulf coast) antebellum south. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sagascend Moderator-at-Large

Joined: 17 Jun 2006 {Posts: 2418 }
|
Posted: Fri 30 May 2008 20:04 Post subject: |
|
|
A serious and productive discussion about colorism or any other "ism" cannot ensue from stroking hurt egos on either side. In order to resolve a problem between two entities who have been wronged from their own perspective, and have perhaps disproportionately benefited from some sort of advantage, both sides have to hear one another and find common ground. They also have to stop lashing out at one another just because it hurts to hear the truth sometimes. The truth is not only that darkskinned people have suffered and been made to feel inferior, but that lighter skinned people have as well. Do the reasons why matter more than the the suffering and personal pain on both sides? If the answer is "yes" then the problem of colorism will never go away because people will find a justification to continue treating people a certain way based on skin color/other racialized traits. If the answer is "no," and pain is pain, the focus is on removing it. To me, the latter approach will resolve the problem and the former will perpetuate it.
There are some things that are just true in this society when it comes to advantages or unearned privileges, but even in these cases nothing stays the same. Once upon a time women were revered as made in the image of God and now nothing could be further from the truth according to most of the world's religions. Once upon a time, skin color was as irrelevant as eye color. Things change. If they do, change can happen again when people change their mentalities and do not pass on these pathologies to their children. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gemini072 Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 2942 }
|
Posted: Tue 03 Jun 2008 17:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| fwsweet wrote: | Funny. This was a topic of lively discussion after my lecture on Wednesday. The lecture was about The Perception of "Racial" Traits, but somehow the post-lecture discussion turned to U.S. colorism. The class never really resolved it, of course, but some interesting points made were:
1. As Richard suggests, it is politically correct nowadays to praise a deeper sub-Saharan phenotype and to denigrate a mixed phenotype. The reverse is politically incorrect.
2. The old colorism phrases ("If you're white you're all right, if you're brown stick around, if you're black get back.") are still quoted, but as an example of the bad old days rather than as serious behavioral teaching to the young.
there was a 4th, If your yellow your mellow
3. Objective measurements (denial of opportunity, workplace discrimination, pay rate) show the opposite. The darker you are, the more likely you are to suffer discrimination. This is especially true in the entertainment industry, where mixed actors are much more likely to get hired.
That last statement may be true for women but the opposite for men.
That may come from of Americas taboos and curiosities of the virile Mandingo man vs the effeminate Mulatto man.
4. The pro-dark, anti-mixed attitude that Richard saw on the Tyra Banks show was quite common in the antebellum north and upper south. On the other hand, the "ïf you're brown sitck around" attitude was the socially accepted norm in the lower (gulf coast) antebellum south. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gawosany New User

Joined: 11 Jun 2008 {Posts: 12 }
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 00:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Lighter skin is almost always preferred which is why certain things are said the way they are.
You refuse to acknowledge that.
If it were the other way around, and your light skin was thought of as ugly, wouldn't it be nice if your skin were celebrated once in a while?
It's kind of like trying to make darker skin more acceptable.
I think that was the point of the show ... not to demean lighter skinned people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gemini072 Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 2942 }
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 00:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| gawosany wrote: | Lighter skin is almost always preferred which is why certain things are said the way they are.
Not as much in our times. Especially men. Darker skinned AA men, swarthy Italians, tanned beach boys etc etc
For men being darker is better. Darker African descendant American men are prefered over lighter skinned ones.
You refuse to acknowledge that.
If it were the other way around, and your light skin was thought of as ugly, wouldn't it be nice if your skin were celebrated once in a while?
It's kind of like trying to make darker skin more acceptable.
I think that was the point of the show ... not to demean lighter skinned people. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gawosany New User

Joined: 11 Jun 2008 {Posts: 12 }
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 00:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| gemini072 wrote: | | gawosany wrote: | Lighter skin is almost always preferred which is why certain things are said the way they are.
Not as much in our times. Especially men. Darker skinned AA men, swarthy Italians, tanned beach boys etc etc
For men being darker is better. Darker African descendant American men are prefered over lighter skinned ones.
You refuse to acknowledge that.
If it were the other way around, and your light skin was thought of as ugly, wouldn't it be nice if your skin were celebrated once in a while?
It's kind of like trying to make darker skin more acceptable.
I think that was the point of the show ... not to demean lighter skinned people. |
|
No. All of black men are appreciated and loved. Dark skin to light.
But for women it is a complete massacre.
And I can't believe he would even defend that woman who said all dark skinned women are beneath light skinned women.
How could she say something like that?
She even generalized and said all dark skinned women have big lips and big noses.
Degrading and degrading.
Not once did she say, she preferred lighter skinned women. She just said that black women were ugly.
And Tyra was right. She IS the slave master's dream. We're all divided now.
And NO ONE should feel bad about their white heritage but NO ONE should be made to feel bad about their darker skin either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ImBack Suspended

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 {Posts: 630 }
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 01:05 Post subject: |
|
|
Lighter skinned blacks and mulattos are treated much better than darker blacks.
This is evident from incidents of reported discrimination. Dark skinned blacks experience discrimination at a rate 7 times higher than that of the other two groups. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gemini072 Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 2942 }
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 01:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| ImBack wrote: | Lighter skinned blacks and mulattos are treated much better than darker blacks.
This is evident from incidents of reported discrimination. Dark skinned blacks experience discrimination at a rate 7 times higher than that of the other two groups. |
It all depends on what environment.
The topic is wide, not just on being treated better or worse by whites.
Darker skinned men mixed or not are seen as more attractive in our society. In modelling it's actually darker men that are featured more. In Hollywood, darker actors are sought out over lighter ones.
they are represented much more in the Sports world which is like apple pie in America. Which makes them more accessible to the general/mainstream American population.
Even in American literature of the 1800's mulatto men were hardly even discussed or mentioned, it was always mixed and fair skinned women. In discussions about the Quadroon & the Octoroon-that was focused on the women, not the men. the Tragic Mulatto was always a woman or 99% of the time a woman.
Lighter skinned and mixed women are more popular that their male counterparts
Darker skinned women (non mixed) are less popular than their male counterparts.
Last edited by gemini072 on Fri 13 Jun 2008 13:50; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grasshoppa Mentor

Joined: 07 Oct 2007 {Posts: 248 } Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 02:20 Post subject: |
|
|
I happen to like women with plump lips.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DChapman Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 1763 } Location: Hudson Valley, NY
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 11:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| ImBack wrote: | Lighter skinned blacks and mulattos are treated much better than darker blacks.
This is evident from incidents of reported discrimination. Dark skinned blacks experience discrimination at a rate 7 times higher than that of the other two groups. |
Are there any studies that show this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
divana Experienced User

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 {Posts: 119 } Location: Somewhere...
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 18:59 Post subject: |
|
|
It's sort of funny to hear this discussion. Light skin black and dark-skin black...LOL! Last time I checked, the color "black" looks like the crayon - no variation. All are African descendants with different complexions. But anyway...
Many people prefer different complexions for all kinds of reasons - sometimes for ignorant reasons. For these reasons, often people of all complexions have and continue to be mistreated and hurt by it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
onlyhuman77 Experienced User

Joined: 15 Apr 2008 {Posts: 187 } Location: Harlem, NYC
|
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2008 21:15 Post subject: |
|
|
It's my observation African Americans that have access to a multitude of resources have it much easier than those who do not. The spectrum of Darker to Lighter complexioned African Americans is filled with many accusations and false assumptions when attempting to determine who has it the worse depending on whom is asked.
And based on my own experience, being a dark complexioned Geechee (African American) male, there haven't been any instances that I felt that if I were a light complexioned male I would have more doors in life opened for me or harassed to a lesser extent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ImBack Suspended

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 {Posts: 630 }
|
Posted: Sun 15 Jun 2008 03:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| DChapman wrote: | | ImBack wrote: | Lighter skinned blacks and mulattos are treated much better than darker blacks.
This is evident from incidents of reported discrimination. Dark skinned blacks experience discrimination at a rate 7 times higher than that of the other two groups. |
Are there any studies that show this? |
Yes. There are several studies and this statistic was taken from a particular bit of research which was printed in the news a few years ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gemini072 Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 2942 }
|
Posted: Sun 15 Jun 2008 03:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| onlyhuman77 wrote: | It's my observation African Americans that have access to a multitude of resources have it much easier than those who do not. The spectrum of Darker to Lighter complexioned African Americans is filled with many accusations and false assumptions when attempting to determine who has it the worse depending on whom is asked.
And based on my own experience, being a dark complexioned Geechee (African American) male, there haven't been any instances that I felt that if I were a light complexioned male I would have more doors in life opened for me or harassed to a lesser extent. |
A friend of mine who very fair skinned went into the military out of high school. He went in with a buddy of his who was dark skinned, and they had a conversation with me after they got out about how they thought they would be treated according to complexion. They both totally agreed that there was no special treatment alotted Will for being light and no worse treatment for Anthony for being dark. They said in the military they were treated like soldiers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DChapman Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 1763 } Location: Hudson Valley, NY
|
Posted: Sun 15 Jun 2008 18:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| ImBack wrote: | | Yes. There are several studies and this statistic was taken from a particular bit of research which was printed in the news a few years ago. |
ok. Can you please post or give the url. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Miller Wizard

Joined: 26 May 2007 {Posts: 425 } Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Mon 16 Jun 2008 00:39 Post subject: |
|
|
| gemini072 wrote: | | A friend of mine who very fair skinned went into the military out of high school. He went in with a buddy of his who was dark skinned, and they had a conversation with me after they got out about how they thought they would be treated according to complexion. They both totally agreed that there was no special treatment alotted Will for being light and no worse treatment for Anthony for being dark. They said in the military they were treated like soldiers. |
All depends on where you're stationed as well. The "Filipino Mafia" is no joke in the military...
And then you look at sexism, where at least in the Navy, "breast envy" becomes a problem due to forced-distribution performance appraisal system - where the attractive women recieve higher appraisals, regardless of their performance, while men and average-looking women get what's left.
The military is not always what everyone thinks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gemini072 Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 2942 }
|
Posted: Mon 16 Jun 2008 02:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| Richard Miller wrote: | | gemini072 wrote: | | A friend of mine who very fair skinned went into the military out of high school. He went in with a buddy of his who was dark skinned, and they had a conversation with me after they got out about how they thought they would be treated according to complexion. They both totally agreed that there was no special treatment alotted Will for being light and no worse treatment for Anthony for being dark. They said in the military they were treated like soldiers. |
All depends on where you're stationed as well. The "Filipino Mafia" is no joke in the military...
And then you look at sexism, where at least in the Navy, "breast envy" becomes a problem due to forced-distribution performance appraisal system - where the attractive women recieve higher appraisals, regardless of their performance, while men and average-looking women get what's left.
The military is not always what everyone thinks. |
Thanks 4 pointing that out. Since I was never in the military. My father was and he had an experience similar to my friend Will.
But my example and yours prove that just because someone is dark doesn't mean they will be treated worse, and someone light will be treated better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ImBack Suspended

Joined: 28 Jun 2006 {Posts: 630 }
|
Posted: Mon 16 Jun 2008 08:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| DChapman wrote: | | ImBack wrote: | | Yes. There are several studies and this statistic was taken from a particular bit of research which was printed in the news a few years ago. |
ok. Can you please post or give the url. |
Sure. Seems I was wrong about the figure though, its 11 times!
ABSTRACT:
It is widely assumed that dark-skinned Blacks have higher rates of hypertension than their lighter-skinned cohorts because the former experience greater racial discrimination. However, there is no empirical evidence linking skin color to discrimination. This study tested the extent to which skin color is associated with differential exposure to discrimination for a sample of 300 Black adults. Results revealed that dark-skinned Blacks were 11 times more likely to experience frequent racial discrimination than their light-skinned counterparts; 67% of subjects reporting high discrimination were dark-skinned and only 8.5% were light-skinned. These preliminary findings suggest that skin color indeed may be a marker for racial discrimination and highlight the need to assess discrimination in studies of the skin color–hypertension relationship.
STUDY:
Is Skin Color a Marker for Racial Discrimination? Explaining the Skin Color–Hypertension Relationship
Authors: Klonoff E.A.1; Landrine H.1
Source: Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Volume 23, Number 4, August 2000 , pp. 329-338(10)
Publisher: Springer
URL:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10984862 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|