The Study of Racialism Forum Index
The Study of Racialism
Discussion of U.S. Racialism
Please read The Rules before posting.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch     RegisterRegister 
   Log inLog in 
'

Aime Cesaire's -- WHAT IS NEGRITUDE TO ME*

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Caribbean Basin
Author Message
jjnetoneak
Probationary


Joined: 06 Jan 2009
{Posts: 0 }
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon 26 Jun 2006 18:02    Post subject: Aime Cesaire's -- WHAT IS NEGRITUDE TO ME* Reply with quote



- Aime Cesaire was born in Martinique [1913]. He was a poet, playwright, politician, and a member of the French Communist Party until Russia invaded Hungary in the mid 1950's -- which made him distanced himself to form the PPM. Cesaire influenced Frantz Fanon's Black Skin, White Masks, a revolutionary treatise on the adverse effects of colonialism.

- Negritude restored what slavery & colonialism took away culturally from African Folks. Aime Cesaire along with Leopold Senghor, Leon Damas, and others coined this term of a restored identity. These are excerpts from an essay by Cesaire during a conference on "Negritude, Ethnicity and Afro Cultures in the Americas" -- held in Miami in 1987.

*THE AFRICAN PRESENCE IN THE AMERICAS*, ed. by Moore / Sanders / Moore [pp. 13-16]. Aime Cesaire's in his own words:

I confess to not always liking the word Negritude even if I myself, with the complicity of others, contributed to inventing and promoting it.
But even if I do not revere the term, I affirm that the word negritude fits a visible reality and fulfills an undoubtedly profound need.
What is this reality?
An ethnic reality, some would say.
But the word ethnic should not confound us.
In fact, negritude is not essential of a biological nature. Beyond immediate biology, it obviously refers to something deeper, more precisely, to a sum of lived experiences which have defined and characterized one of the forms of human condition made by history. Its common denominator is not skin color as such but the fact that we all belong in one way or another to a people who has suffered and continues to suffer, a people who is marginilized and oppressed.
I shall never forget the day I saw in a bookstore window in Quebec a book whose title bewildered me: WE THE WHITE NEGROES OF AMERICA (Nous Autres Negres Blanc D' Amerique). Of course I smiled at the exaggeration, yet I said to myself: "Well, this author may be exaggerating, but at least he has understood negritude."
Yes we do constitute a community of a very particular type, recognizable for what it is and for what it has been. First, it is a community forged out of suffered oppression, imposed exclusion and discrimination. And to its honor, it is also a community of continued resistance, of stubborn struggle and of indominable hope.
At least that's what negritude was to us then as young students. There was Leopold Senghor, Leon Damas, myself, Alioune Diop and other fellowmen who met at Presence Africaine. Negritude is still all of that to the surviving members of that group. Discredited, misused and distorted, the term negritude continues to be difficult to apprehend.
Negritude is not a philosophy.
Negritude is not metaphysics.
Negritude is not a pretentious conception of the universe.
It is a way of living a history within history; the history of a community whose experience is indeed unparalleled with its populationdeportations, its forced migrations of men and women from one continent to another, the wreckage of slaughtered cultures and remnamts of long forgotten beliefs.
How can this coherence not constitute a specific heritage?
What more is needed to create an identity?
Who cares about chromosomes?
I believe in archetypes.
I believe in the value of all that is buried in the collective memory and even in the collective unconsciousness.
I don't believe that we come into the world with an empty brain in the same way that we come with empty hands.
I believe in the virtue of accumulated and secular experiences conveyed by cultures.
I have never been able to believe that the thousands of Africans that the slave trade transported to the Americas could have had no other importance than that of their animal strength--an animal strength similar to and not necessarily superior to that of the horse or the ox--and that they not impregnate the new civilization with a certain number of essential values, these new societies being potential carriers.
That is to say, that negritude in its initial stage can be defined as sudden awarness of difference, as a collective memory, as loyalty, and last, as a form of solidarity.
Negritude is not only passive suffering and enduring.
Nor is pathetic or painful.
Negritude arises from an active and aggressive attitude of the mind.
It is a sudden reawakening.
It is refusal.
It is a struggle.
It is a revolt.
But then--you may ask--revolt against what?
I believe that negritude has historically been a form of revolt against the world cultural order as it was constituted over the last centuries, characterized by a number of prejudices and presuppositions that led to a very strict hierarchy. In other words, negritude has been a revolt against what I call European redutionism. I want to talk about this system of thought, or rather of the instinctive inclination of an eminent and prestigious civilization to abuse even its own prestige in order to make a void around itself by abusively reducing the notion of universal to its own dimensions; that is, to think of universality from the point of view of its own assumptions an categories.
We have seen all too well the consequences this has wrought to cut man off from himself, from his roots, from the universe, from his own humanity and, as a result, to isolate him in a suicidal pride when not in a rationalistic and scientific form of barbarism.
But--you will tell me--a revolt which is only a revolt constitute no more than a historical dead end.
If negritude has not bee a dead end, it is because it was leading somewhere. Where? It was leading us to ourselves. After a long experience of frustration, we managed at last to seize our own past and, through the imaginary, grasp the intermittent flashing of our potential being.
A revolution of concepts, a cultural earthquake; all metaphors are possible here. The essential is that negritude spawned the rehabilitation of our values by ourselves; the plumbing of the depths of our past by ourselves; of our own re-rooting in a history, a geography and a culture; the whole given meaning not by an archaic dwelling on the past but by reactivation of the past in order to leave it behind.........


PEACE
Back to top
femmedecouleur
Mentor
Mentor


Joined: 03 Jun 2005
{Posts: 270 }
Location: California

PostPosted: Wed 28 Jun 2006 00:50    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting post!
Back to top
Mariani
Regular User
Regular User


Joined: 15 Jun 2006
{Posts: 82 }

PostPosted: Sat 01 Jul 2006 16:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interestingly the psychiatrist Franz Fanon always considered the concept of negritude too simplistic. In Black Skin White Masks he talks about the feelings of inferiority many people in the French Carribbean still have who according to him "after the white error are now living the big black mirage."
Back to top
Fledgist
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Mar 2006
{Posts: 235 }
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Sun 02 Jul 2006 01:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mariani wrote:
Interestingly the psychiatrist Franz Fanon always considered the concept of negritude too simplistic. In Black Skin White Masks he talks about the feelings of inferiority many people in the French Carribbean still have who according to him "after the white error are now living the big black mirage."


Still have? Black Skin, White Mask was written more than half a century ago. I'm not questioning its importance, I'm just wondering if the reality it describes and the reality of Martinique and Guadeloupe today are identical.
Back to top
Mariani
Regular User
Regular User


Joined: 15 Jun 2006
{Posts: 82 }

PostPosted: Sun 02 Jul 2006 05:16    Post subject: Reply with quote

Negritude is even older. I think Fanon is still accurate in many ways and his analysis does not only apply to the French Carribbean in my opinion. I don't want to elaborate on this though because it's ugly. At the same time we see certain mentalities and ideologies embraced more than ever especially among younger people. It's definetively "the big black mirage after the white error".
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Sun 02 Jul 2006 13:18    Post subject: Reply with quote

The concept of Creolite came as a counterpoint to Negritude
Back to top
femmedecouleur
Mentor
Mentor


Joined: 03 Jun 2005
{Posts: 270 }
Location: California

PostPosted: Sun 02 Jul 2006 20:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fledgist wrote:
Mariani wrote:
Interestingly the psychiatrist Franz Fanon always considered the concept of negritude too simplistic. In Black Skin White Masks he talks about the feelings of inferiority many people in the French Carribbean still have who according to him "after the white error are now living the big black mirage."


Still have? Black Skin, White Mask was written more than half a century ago. I'm not questioning its importance, I'm just wondering if the reality it describes and the reality of Martinique and Guadeloupe today are identical.


Flawed as I believe Fanon's "Black Skin, White Masks" is, I do believe it is still relevant to the conditons that still exist in the French Antilles. Be advised that his work was not really lauded in France or its departments (former colonies) nearly as much as it was lauded in the Americas.

The simmering issues are still there in the French Antilles, but they've also morphed and been diluted a bit. Also, much of the population has moved to France (Metropole), which has also shifted the issues to French soil.
Back to top
Fledgist
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Mar 2006
{Posts: 235 }
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Sun 02 Jul 2006 23:54    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mariani wrote:
Negritude is even older. I think Fanon is still accurate in many ways and his analysis does not only apply to the French Carribbean in my opinion. I don't want to elaborate on this though because it's ugly. At the same time we see certain mentalities and ideologies embraced more than ever especially among younger people. It's definetively "the big black mirage after the white error".


I wonder how truw that is given the impact not only of négritude but also of black nationalist ideas over the 54 years since Fanon wrote that book. I can remember -- granted this was thirty years ago -- seeing a performance of Glissant's poetry that made reference to Malcolm X.
Back to top
Fledgist
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Mar 2006
{Posts: 235 }
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Sun 02 Jul 2006 23:57    Post subject: Reply with quote

femmedecouleur wrote:
Fledgist wrote:
Mariani wrote:
Interestingly the psychiatrist Franz Fanon always considered the concept of negritude too simplistic. In Black Skin White Masks he talks about the feelings of inferiority many people in the French Carribbean still have who according to him "after the white error are now living the big black mirage."


Still have? Black Skin, White Mask was written more than half a century ago. I'm not questioning its importance, I'm just wondering if the reality it describes and the reality of Martinique and Guadeloupe today are identical.


Flawed as I believe Fanon's "Black Skin, White Masks" is, I do believe it is still relevant to the conditons that still exist in the French Antilles. Be advised that his work was not really lauded in France or its departments (former colonies) nearly as much as it was lauded in the Americas.

The simmering issues are still there in the French Antilles, but they've also morphed and been diluted a bit. Also, much of the population has moved to France (Metropole), which has also shifted the issues to French soil.


I know that Fanon's work has had a lot of influence here (heaven knows, i read it as a youth and I teach bits of it today -- granted, when I first read it I lived in the Caribbean). My graduate students continue to think Fanon has a lot to say to them.

However, life in the Antilles is not the same today as it was when Fanon lived there, much less when he wrote the book (as he was living in France at the time). I just wonder how true it is of conditions today.
Back to top
Mariani
Regular User
Regular User


Joined: 15 Jun 2006
{Posts: 82 }

PostPosted: Tue 04 Jul 2006 21:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fledgist wrote:
Mariani wrote:
Negritude is even older. I think Fanon is still accurate in many ways and his analysis does not only apply to the French Carribbean in my opinion. I don't want to elaborate on this though because it's ugly. At the same time we see certain mentalities and ideologies embraced more than ever especially among younger people. It's definetively "the big black mirage after the white error".

I wonder how truw that is given the impact not only of négritude but also of black nationalist ideas over the 54 years since Fanon wrote that book. I can remember -- granted this was thirty years ago -- seeing a performance of Glissant's poetry that made reference to Malcolm X.

Unless we misunderstood each other, this is exactly what I meant. From one extrem to the other.

Fledgist wrote:
However, life in the Antilles is not the same today as it was when Fanon lived there, much less when he wrote the book (as he was living in France at the time). I just wonder how true it is of conditions today.

I don't think life still has to be exactly the same in order for Fanon's analysis to still be relevent and accurate in many ways. After all life is no longer the same as when Césaire first got involved in négritude in 1934 either.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Caribbean Basin All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group