The Study of Racialism Forum Index
The Study of Racialism
Discussion of U.S. Racialism
Please read The Rules before posting.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch     RegisterRegister 
   Log inLog in 
'

Rule 3.7: Semantic deadlock

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Site Management
Author Message
High School Teacher
Mentor
Mentor


Joined: 02 Feb 2007
{Posts: 255 }
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon 10 Sep 2007 02:47    Post subject: Rule 3.7: Semantic deadlock Reply with quote

Quote:
3.7 Once a Dispute is Revealed to be a Semantic Difference, End It. — Many disputes turn out to be mere differences in word usage between the parties. Once this is apparent, you must end the dispute immediately.



Shouldn't the parties (or at least one of them) involved in a "dispute" decide when a difference of opinion is merely semantic? Why not let a debate run its course, as long as its civil, rather than micromanage discussion to the point of absurdity?
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 4587 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Mon 10 Sep 2007 03:04    Post subject: Re: Rule 3.7: Semantic deadlock Reply with quote

High School Teacher wrote:
Shouldn't the parties (or at least one of them) involved in a "dispute" decide when a difference of opinion is merely semantic?

No. I alone make the rules. Although I accept input, the final decision is mine. If this makes you uncomfortable, leave.
High School Teacher wrote:
Why not let a debate run its course, as long as its civil, rather than micromanage discussion to the point of absurdity?

Because some people join online discussion groups to spout unsubstantiated opinions and argue with others who are similarly inclined. That is not the mission of this site, and I will not have such people participating here. That is not "micromanagement." It is enforcing boundaries that must not be crossed.

This site does not tolerate debates over unsubstantiated opinions, especially semantic ones, even if some members enjoy that sort of puerile silliness. There are many sites that welcome such debate. This is not one of them. Again, if you find our rules too constraining, leave.
Back to top
High School Teacher
Mentor
Mentor


Joined: 02 Feb 2007
{Posts: 255 }
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon 10 Sep 2007 03:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
No. I alone make the rules.



That says it all. This is not about "unsubstantiated opinions", "members who enjoy . . . silliness", etc. Its really about unfettered control. Its all good though. LOL!
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 4587 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Mon 10 Sep 2007 18:50    Post subject: Reply with quote

High School Teacher wrote:
Its really about unfettered control.

Correct. You might want to write that down, since you always seem to forget it after a while.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> Site Management All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group