|
|
| Author |
Message |
sagascend Moderator-at-Large

Joined: 17 Jun 2006 {Posts: 2418 }
|
Posted: Wed 13 Sep 2006 17:49 Post subject: African Female Beauty: Non Existent or Just Not Represented? |
|
|
Discussions on how attractive men find women of African descent are sprinkled throughout the ODR forum. Many times, if a given beautiful woman is described as "Black" or "African" posters will point to evidence (to them) of European/Asian/Native American admixture, almost as if to say "yeah she's beautiful but that's because she is mixed."
Has the Eurocentric standard of beauty truly warped our ability to appreciate African beauty? Obviously many men do find dark skin, coiled or kinky hair and African features attractive or no women with these attributes would ever reproduce. It is also clear that many women of African descent are starting to embrace their unique beauty and learn how to appreciate their hair, skin and features as they are. Why has this been so difficult and what actions are making this adoption difficult? Side note: In a conversation with a friend who is a chemist I learned that chemical relaxers are some of the most profitable beauty products on the market. They are dirt cheap to make and produce and create highly dependent and life-long customers. Makes you wonder, as with many popular products, at what point the cart is pulling the horse.
I've posted some pictures of Africa-descended women I think are beautiful. I have intentionally chosen women whose non-African admixture, if present, wouldn't be apparent to most Americans.
To paraphase a friend of mine: Only a racist would kick these women out of bed!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 5380 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Wed 13 Sep 2006 18:15 Post subject: Re: African Female Beauty: Non Existent or Just Not Represented? |
|
|
| sagascend wrote: | | Has the Eurocentric standard of beauty truly warped our ability to appreciate African beauty? |
Aesthetics are personal and involuntary, of course. Everyone has an individual standard of beauty, probably formed in early childhood. FWIW, my own standard of beauty leans towards fitness, physical grace, and youth. Among the most beautiful people that I have ever seen are the photographs of Nuba people in the Sudan taken by Leni Riefenstahl in the 1960s. The photos were featured in: Stern, The Sunday Times Magazine, Paris Match, L'Europeo, Newsweek, and The Sun, as well as in several award-winning books including: The Nuba and The Nuba of Kau. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MisterLawyer Moderator

Joined: 02 May 2006 {Posts: 444 } Location: Île-de-France
|
Posted: Thu 14 Sep 2006 13:51 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think eurocentric standards have warped men's sense of beauty. Everyone has their preferences. I also think many of your pictures represent a current standard of "beauty" that doesn't have anything to do with Eurocentricity--being way too thin. For example.....
.....way too skinny.
Also represented is another not necissarily eurocentric standard, the large fake breast look, which a suprising number of men don't find beautiful.
A little too high and tight. They look like they might pop. She was probably perfect before
Now, if you asked me....
.....thats a beautiful woman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sagascend Moderator-at-Large

Joined: 17 Jun 2006 {Posts: 2418 }
|
Posted: Thu 14 Sep 2006 14:09 Post subject: |
|
|
I definitely agree that preferences are ultimately personal and probably subconscious/predetermined to some extent. But, just like millions coffee drinkers go to Starbucks (they are EVERYWHERE), at what point does proliferation and marketing influence individual choices and preferences? Does Starbucks serve better coffee drinks that Caribou or Seattle's Best or have people just learned to associate good coffee with Starbucks? IMO it is the same with beauty - pretty much the entire world has learned or is learning to judge female beauty according to Eurocentric standards. Thus, fairskinned/white European-looking women are the Starbucks of female beauty. Much maligned in some circles but still raking in the customers.
As for the women I selected, I believe that all except two are models so of course their bodies are going to be thinner. To me, if thin is the standard, they are as attractive as any similarly shaped women who are not of African descent that we see glorified in popular media. I also looked mostly at their faces (hey I'm a girl afterall) and skin tone. And I agree that Serena is a gorgeous girl - the second picture I posted is of her (at least I thought it was). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Salsassin SuperWizard

Joined: 04 Apr 2005 {Posts: 3515 }
|
Posted: Fri 15 Sep 2006 01:10 Post subject: |
|
|
Some of the girls you posted could be mixed. But I have dated African women who were stunning and are also exemplified by some of the pictures posted.
Shoot Lusungu, a Zulu princess from Zimbabwe I dated was foine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Truffling New User

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 {Posts: 13 }
|
Posted: Sun 15 Oct 2006 15:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Some of those women in the pictures you posted are very very pretty. In general, I do think that 'real' african women can be under represented in the press and even on a 'social' street level. They are seen as too 'primitive' (if that is the right word) to be beautiful and a black woman must be mixed if she seen as attractive. Also; a dark skinned african featured black men will find it easier to be viewed as attractive than his female counterpart ever could. I have met so many naturally beautiful african women who have taken many a man's (and woman's) breath away so I personally do not understand this viewpoint.
Also, those who do 'represent' black people in the media spotlight on a wider level (such as hollywood movies) are often of african-american origin so, with many exceptions obviously, tend to have a look which doesn't adhere to being 'straight out of africa'. It is often obvious when you look at the media that lighter skinned or those with less strong african features are preffered a lot more than their darker skin very african looking counterparts. I, for a long time, thought that most african-american people were recently mixed till I actually went out there myself! However, I do not necessarily believe that the preference for light skin in the media is the fault of 'white brainwashing' but rather a problem within the black community. This is because what I see myself on a social level. Being called 'lucky' or more sought out by men because of my skin tone or features (especially when I compare it to how my darker female friends or how my darker brothers are treated). I often feel a sense of guilt because it can be so obvious sometimes. Don't get me wrong, I like being flattered! I just hate the reason why I am viewed as attractive by some people some of the time.
In the UK where I live darker black people are often highly represented just as much as their counterparts on television (more so sometimes!). The trend is to show more mixed raced (caribbean and white) people too as that is becoming a trend now over here. But still, the representation of african beauty is still shied away from and barely touched. When it is shown it is treated as some sort of fetish or 'amazing rarity', like a beautiful black african is so odd and unheard of .
In the words of Iman (or something like it anyway!): "Why can't a black woman be chosen for her beauty and not to make some controversial point?". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
triguy Superuser

Joined: 27 Apr 2005 {Posts: 878 }
|
Posted: Wed 18 Oct 2006 02:58 Post subject: |
|
|
This isn't just a question for black women. Many people of color in the U.S. find themselves questioning their beauty because they don't have "classical" or all-American looks. Noses that are too wide or too hooked-shaped, eyes that have a mono-lid, etc. make people question their beauty. Similarly, the rate of body dysmorphic illnesses has increased over the years. Women and now men question their bodies because they don't look as thin, muscular or sexy as others.
P.S.
In Vietnam and Korea, mixed-race children of American soldiers were treated poorly and told that their features made them ugly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYWM Probationary
Joined: 04 Nov 2006 {Posts: 5 }
|
Posted: Sat 18 Nov 2006 08:36 Post subject: Re: African Female Beauty: Non Existent or Just Not Represen |
|
|
| sagascend wrote: | Discussions on how attractive men find women of African descent are sprinkled throughout the ODR forum. Many times, if a given beautiful woman is described as "Black" or "African" posters will point to evidence (to them) of European/Asian/Native American admixture, almost as if to say "yeah she's beautiful but that's because she is mixed."
Has the Eurocentric standard of beauty truly warped our ability to appreciate African beauty? Obviously many men do find dark skin, coiled or kinky hair and African features attractive or no women with these attributes would ever reproduce. It is also clear that many women of African descent are starting to embrace their unique beauty and learn how to appreciate their hair, skin and features as they are. Why has this been so difficult and what actions are making this adoption difficult? Side note: In a conversation with a friend who is a chemist I learned that chemical relaxers are some of the most profitable beauty products on the market. They are dirt cheap to make and produce and create highly dependent and life-long customers. Makes you wonder, as with many popular products, at what point the cart is pulling the horse.
I've posted some pictures of Africa-descended women I think are beautiful. I have intentionally chosen women whose non-African admixture, if present, wouldn't be apparent to most Americans.
|
I believe there was appreciation for women with African features for many years, but that it was not acknowledged in the mainsteam. IMO, acknowledgement by the mainstream has been slow, but real. I think Tyra Banks has those traits (to some degree), but I know other people would disagree with me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
G-Man Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2004 {Posts: 2992 }
|
Posted: Mon 20 Nov 2006 14:05 Post subject: |
|
|
Mmmm. Tyra Banks. ..I would agree with you. Personally, I find she looks better today with more body weight than she did in the past when she was actively modeling and thinner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Salsassin SuperWizard

Joined: 04 Apr 2005 {Posts: 3515 }
|
Posted: Mon 20 Nov 2006 16:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tyra definitely does not look like traditional African beauty |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Salsassin SuperWizard

Joined: 04 Apr 2005 {Posts: 3515 }
|
Posted: Mon 20 Nov 2006 17:19 Post subject: |
|
|
And they are still going by eurocentric modeling body types. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sagascend Moderator-at-Large

Joined: 17 Jun 2006 {Posts: 2418 }
|
Posted: Mon 20 Nov 2006 17:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Personally I don't have a problem with that. Every industry creates its standards for behavior/dress, etc. Runway models, according to the current standard, are supposed to be tall and thin like clothes hangers. Commercial models are supposed to be beautiful, girl/guy-next door types. What I have a problem with is the presumption that models who look more African are excluded because they're not as good looking. One rarely sees Asian models in U.S. print media but no one sees it as indication that Asian women are not as beautiful as European women. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bronxnik New User

Joined: 24 Dec 2007 {Posts: 19 }
|
Posted: Wed 26 Dec 2007 23:06 Post subject: |
|
|
>>> .....way too skinny
you reject her?
i'll close my eyes and force myself to do her. Hey, it's just to help her self-esteem!
i'm sure every female on the board realizes how sincere i am to help this young woman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bronxnik New User

Joined: 24 Dec 2007 {Posts: 19 }
|
Posted: Wed 26 Dec 2007 23:11 Post subject: |
|
|
>> And they are still going by eurocentric modeling body types.
i've traveled a bit in Africa. More than you perhaps. Certainly, I've chased skirts alongside African guys more than you have.
My guess is that the african guys wouldn't throw this item out of bed for being "too euro". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Monica Mentor

Joined: 02 Oct 2007 {Posts: 345 }
|
Posted: Wed 26 Dec 2007 23:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| MisterLawyer wrote: | I don't think eurocentric standards have warped men's sense of beauty. Everyone has their preferences. I also think many of your pictures represent a current standard of "beauty" that doesn't have anything to do with Eurocentricity--being way too thin. For example.....
.....way too skinny.
Also represented is another not necissarily eurocentric standard, the large fake breast look, which a suprising number of men don't find beautiful.
A little too high and tight. They look like they might pop. She was probably perfect before
Now, if you asked me....
.....thats a beautiful woman. |
Your post is very much on point, all my sons and my husband LOVE the Williams sisters and that noise they make. ...yuck....
I wonder if women actually have their own standards of judging other women that has absolutely nothing to do with what men like...I have a flat butt and my whole life I've been jealous of women with shapely butts...but the shape of my backside didn't stop me from getting the men I've wanted.
Last edited by Monica on Wed 26 Dec 2007 23:30; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Monica Mentor

Joined: 02 Oct 2007 {Posts: 345 }
|
Posted: Wed 26 Dec 2007 23:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| sagascend wrote: | I definitely agree that preferences are ultimately personal and probably subconscious/predetermined to some extent. But, just like millions coffee drinkers go to Starbucks (they are EVERYWHERE), at what point does proliferation and marketing influence individual choices and preferences? Does Starbucks serve better coffee drinks that Caribou or Seattle's Best or have people just learned to associate good coffee with Starbucks? IMO it is the same with beauty - pretty much the entire world has learned or is learning to judge female beauty according to Eurocentric standards. Thus, fairskinned/white European-looking women are the Starbucks of female beauty. Much maligned in some circles but still raking in the customers.
As for the women I selected, I believe that all except two are models so of course their bodies are going to be thinner. To me, if thin is the standard, they are as attractive as any similarly shaped women who are not of African descent that we see glorified in popular media. I also looked mostly at their faces (hey I'm a girl afterall) and skin tone. And I agree that Serena is a gorgeous girl - the second picture I posted is of her (at least I thought it was). |
I think we as women ASSUME that the white standards of beauty are desired but as a woman who employs women and deals with women as a customer base...beauty has absolutely nothing to do with finding a dedicated and mentally healthy mate
I've had clients pretty, shapely, getting their butts kicked by abusive men...and other clients skinny, popeyed with BAD breath and a dedicated good guy husband, the father of all three of her children. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
punjabtrini Mentor

Joined: 04 Sep 2007 {Posts: 253 } Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu 27 Dec 2007 04:19 Post subject: |
|
|
For me, none of the women fit my own personal aesthetic of African beauty! They are beautiful in their own right, the tennis player appears tougher then me (I am a weakling, of course) and the other women though appealing lack a quality I often associate with African women (from Africa).
The women are obviously African but they represent one aspect of African beauty! That specific type, I am guessing is West African as opposed to East African or Central /Southern Africa. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SweetCocoa New User

Joined: 17 Jan 2008 {Posts: 19 }
|
Posted: Thu 17 Jan 2008 23:13 Post subject: |
|
|
There actually is a universal standard of beauty. It It involves the markers for reproductive fitness. These are symmetry, youth (blemish free skin, large eyes, full lips, small chin, straight, white teeth) and a small hip to waist ratio (a.k.a the hourglass shape). This has been scientifically proven. Any woman in any culture that fits these basic criteria will be seen as attractive.
The other beauty standard, which comes into play where black women are concerned, is cultural. Our cultural standard is influenced by a Eurocentric aesthetic that values light skin, eyes, long silky hair and thinness. This is a cultural standard that most black and biracial women cannot hope to approach at all, but some come mighty close. Those that do are considered beautiful. For instance, Halle and Beyonce. The rest of us try to even this unfair playing field by straightening our hair, wearing weaves, buying colored contact lenses or using skin lighteners.
Yes, the women pictured are lovely and I know most red-blooded men of any color would not kick them out of bed for eating crackers. But others would stop at their skin color or the fact that they don’t have long hair and say these women are ugly or not for them even though as far as I can tell they clearly meet the universal standard. (I bet they would tumble into bed with these girls but not consider a relationship). I am an attractive dark skinned woman and I have had men tell me that I am pretty, but too dark, so they weren’t going there. Hmn. Good riddance to bad brainwashed, self-hating rubbish, I say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SweetCocoa New User

Joined: 17 Jan 2008 {Posts: 19 }
|
Posted: Thu 17 Jan 2008 23:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| Truffling wrote: | | Some of those women in the pictures you posted are very very pretty. In general, I do think that 'real' african women can be under represented in the press and even on a 'social' street level. |
Real African woman? What does that mean? Are you referring to the sub-saharan phenotype that has somehow come to be a stereotypic stand in for what a real African should look like? Everybody on the continent of Africa is a real African, my dear. And not all of them have the extremely broad features you may find in west and southern Africa. I hate to be snippy about it, but I get tired of this notion that because every black person doesn’t look like a Dinka or a Zulu that they are not “pure”, I find that that is a preposterous idea. If that’s the case then I suppose a Dravidian Indian is not a “real” Indian compared to his lighter skinned counterpart or that an Italian is not a “real” white person as opposed to a Swede. Co’mon!
But your point is well taken that one type of black women seems to predominate the media and she is lighter skinned and in many cases biracial. And don’t think that this does not influence who we think of as beautiful, because it does. Just like white people think of a tall, thin blonde woman as the ideal.
Yes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. We each hold our individual preferences. But those preferences are intertwined with the messages we have received from our culture. You’re naïve if you don’t recognize this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blackman 2 Regular User

Joined: 27 Jan 2008 {Posts: 69 }
|
Posted: Thu 28 Feb 2008 18:20 Post subject: |
|
|
People must realize that not all "black" Africans look alike and don't fit the stereotypes that most people are fooled into believing.Many people think a "true black" must have coal black skin and look like Idi Amin or Mutumbo or they're mixed w/ something.
| sagascend wrote: | | Many times, if a given beautiful woman is described as "Black" or "African" posters will point to evidence (to them) of European/Asian/Native American admixture, almost as if to say "yeah she's beautiful but that's because she is mixed." |
I agree and I find it very annoying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|