Joined: 31 May 2005 {Posts: 66 } Location: South Carolina
Posted: Thu 20 Oct 2005 02:47 Post subject: Can you believe that there are people who ascribe to this?
Abraham told our Holy Black Brothers and Sisters that if they did not stop their rebellious ways and take heed to his teachings, which was entire submission to the Will of Allah (God), that in the year 8,400, as was predicted, a child by the name of "Yakub", commonly known as "Jacob" in the Bible, would be born and that he would make a people who would rule over them, a people who would deal with them cruelly, a people who would show no mercy, but would show or cause malignity among them. This, up unto this day, we can see these Yakub's grafted devils are masters at causing malice or malign, speaking evil of or causing us to speak evil of each other. So in the year 8,400, Yakub was born, and at the age of six while playing in his uncle's back yard with two pieces of magnet, he found that the unalike attracted the alike; broke down: un-alike=(white); alike=(like Allah, original) and that alike repels. [unalike attracts - alike repels] Do not the Black fight against Black, while being attracted by the devil, wanting to be with him
A good place to start for reference would be "Liberia". We know that Mr. Yakub set up a rigorous birth control system at the beginning of his civilization, by dividing the brown babies from the black, the brown from the reds, the reds from the yellow. Now bear in mind these are only the major solutions, for there were nine more lighter colors that came after these.
The doctor's job was to take blood tests of the people who wanted to be married; if two Black people came to be married, he would pass them without question, but if a Black man and a Sister of light complexion tried to get married, he ( the doctor) would go behind a screen, come back and tell them there were defects in their blood (serpent liar). Now if by chance these couples whom he turned down decided to live together or slip around together, Mr. Yakub, didn't make an issue out of it, he simply had their heads cut off. Today, wonder why before we can get a marriage license (to marry our own queen, incidentally), we must get an approved "blood test"? Believe me, the accursed Shaitan has been a very obedient son to his father Yakub! . . . For he has carried out his works to a tee. Instead of going behind a screen today, the doctor goes into what we call his "laboratory", and after a certain number of different shades has passed, or after a certain quota of the year, he tells some sort of lie to try and hinder a Brother and Sister from so-called legally marrying
The point is that thousands of years ago, Yakub was a renegade black scientist who created the white man. I dare to say this because of what I feel is the truth. This kind of teaching and wording by the NOI is no better than that by white supremacists. They both put out strange and far fetched teachings and fables to illustrate their hateful beliefs.
Posted: Thu 20 Oct 2005 23:03 Post subject: The Pretend Nation of Pretend "Islam"
Notice that the so-called "black Muslims" denounce whites as evil but still want to be married to the descendants of whites they falsely call light-skinned "sistas." Negroes hate "The White Man" but love his genes, especially when they come in nubile feminine flesh.
Posted: Fri 21 Oct 2005 14:17 Post subject: Re: The Pretend Nation of Pretend "Islam"...WD FARD
Powell wrote:
Notice that the so-called "black Muslims" denounce whites as evil but still want to be married to the descendants of whites they falsely call light-skinned "sistas." Negroes hate "The White Man" but love his genes, especially when they come in nubile feminine flesh.
AD always remember that many of those 'black muslims' themselves are mixed or biracial. WD Fard got the movement started, Elijah Mohammed, Malcolm X, Farrahkahn and many of the followers of the NOI are themselves mixed biracial multiracial.
Either he was white himself or multiracial
W.D. Fard arrives in Detroit, Michigan selling silk goods to the city's black population and inviting them to learn about Islam. He promotes his teachings as "the natural religion" for African-Americans, and offers the opportunity to break with Christianity, which some see as a vestige from the days of slavery. Fard's message of self-reliance and black power wins many followers, and the Nation of Islam is formed. When Fard disappears mysteriously in 1934, Elijah Muhammad assumes leadership of the Nation of Islam.
Wallace Fard Muhammad (1877-93? – after 1934) was a preacher and founder of the black nationalist movement the Nation of Islam (NOI), establishing its first mosque in Detroit. He preached his distinctive version of Islam there for three years before mysteriously disappearing in 1934.
Alternative names on record are numerous: Wali Farad, Farrad Mohammed, W.D. Fard, and F. Mohammed Ali. Within the NOI he is generally known as Master Fard Muhammad.
According to FBI records, Fard (pronounced "fuh-RAHD") Muhammad is identical to one Wallace Dodd Ford, also known as Wallace Dodd, whose birth is recorded by the FBI as February 25, 1891, of mixed European and Polynesian parentage. It is uncertain whether he was born in New Zealand or in Portland, Oregon, of parents who came from Hawaii. A recent researcher believes that Dodd was a New Zealander of half-Indian descent, born in 1893. [1] Dodd was certainly in the United States by the 1920s, when he was arrested and imprisoned for drug offenses, serving three years in San Quentin between 1926 and 1929. Photographs and fingerprints of both men exist.
The NOI has, in the past, rejected this identification of Wallace Dodd with Wallace Fard Muhammad, interpreting it as part of a smear campaign. They also claim that he was born in 1877 (which would put him in his fifties when photographed), and that he came from Mecca. Elijah Muhammad—Fard Muhammad's student and successor—had this to say about his teacher, in his book, "Message to the Black Man":
"Allah (God) came to us from the Holy City Mecca, Arabia, in 1930. He used the name Wallace D. Fard, often signing it W.D. Fard. In the third year (1933), He signed His name W.F. Muhammad, which stands for Wallace Fard Muhammad. He came alone. He began teaching us the knowledge of ourselves, of God and the devil, of the measurement of the earth, of other planets, and of the civilizations of some of the planets other than earth."
Elijah Muhammad also challenged the Hearst press, which had publicized the story, to prove its assertion that the Fard and Dodd were one and the same person. A woman stepped forward with what she claimed was proof that Fard and Dodd were indeed one and the same. The woman also claimed to have children fathered by Dodd/Fard. Muhammad was not known to have responded to the claims.
The question of Fard's identity is unresolved, however the current NOI leader, Louis Farrakhan, does accept that Fard was imprisoned, insisting that this was because his preaching threatened the racist status quo, not because of any criminal acts.
[edit]
Life
Taking the view that Fard and Dodd/Ford are one and the same person, his biography can be partially reconstructed up to 1934. His distinctive mixed parentage allowed him to at various times to claim to belong to several different races, often either African or Arab. This may have influenced his later doctrine of the "Asiatic Blackman" and to his emphasis on Islam as the authentic Black religion, though he did not originate these ideas. After his prison experience, he became involved with the Moorish Science Temple of America, founded by Timothy Drew. From Drew's ideas he developed his own idiosyncratic theories, mixing aspects of theosophy and Islam, preaching his new gospel among African Americans. In Detroit, Michigan, he established the Temple of Islam, the University of Islam, a group of male security guards called the Fruit of Islam, and other Black Muslim organizations.
Fard's activities were brought to wider public notice after a major scandal erupted involving an apparent ritual murder in November 1932, reportedly committed by one of Fard's early followers, Robert Karriem, who had done so, in his own words, "to bring himself closer to Allah." Karriem had quoted from Fard's booklet entitled Secret Rituals of the Lost-Found Nation of Islam, "The believer must be stabbed through the heart." This quotation, as well as another stating that "every son of Islam must gain a victory from the devil. Four victories and the son will attain his reward," convinced the Detroit police—motivated in part by the anti-Muslim hysteria fueled by media coverage of the event—to seek out Fard in connection with the murder. Although not charged with any crime, Fard had been asked to leave town in early 1933 and to never return. Fard complied, but returned secretly to Detroit the next year. Fard was arrested and again asked to leave Detroit permanently.
One of Fard's first followers had been Eli Poole, who later changed his name to Elijah Muhammad. Elijah began preaching that Wallace Fard Muhammad was the Mahdi, and even "The True and Living God." Shortly before he departed Detroit for the last time, Fard had conferred leadership of the Nation of Islam on Elijah Muhammad. In 1934, Fard left Detroit and then had disappeared without a trace. According to the NOI, Fard had returned to Mecca. Others believe he had been killed by Elijah Muhammad (who was also suspected of ordering influential NOI dissident Malcolm X assassinated in February 1965). However, there is some evidence that Fard had lived at least until the 1960s; his alleged lover stated that he had returned to New Zealand.
[edit]
Ideology
Fard claimed that a race war was imminent. For Black people in America, the duty was to discover their origins and purpose. Out of all the nations of the Earth, diasporic Africans are the only nation without any knowledge of their history, no control of their present lives, and without any guidance for their future. Black people had been systematically denied knowledge of their true history by their white oppressors. Christianity was a religion of the slave owners that had been forced on enslaved or subordinated Black peoples. Islam was the original faith of Black people prior to slavery. The original peoples of the world were Black. White people were a race of devils created by an evil scientist named Yakub on the island of Patmos. He also claimed that Black people were divine by nature, created by Allah from the dark substance of space, and that a spacecraft was waiting to destroy all white people when the appointed time came.
The idea that Islam is the original true religion is derived from mainstream Islamic theology, which claims that Judaism and Christianity are corrupted forms of God's original message that Muhammad merely reaffirmed. The presence of Islam in eastern countries such as Indonesia as well as the Middle-East may have led Fard to conclude that it was the historical faith of Asian peoples as a whole, but this aspect of his thinking was directly influenced by Drew, who had claimed that all non-Europeans are in fact part of a unified Asian race, which he called "Moorish."
Christian missionary activity under Imperialism may also have contributed to Fard's association of white supremacy with the attempted imposition of "corrupted" religious ideas. The figure of Yakub is derived from the Biblical Jacob (Yakub being a variant spelling of the name), while his activities on Patmos recall St. John's revelations there. Thus, he combines central figures in the founding of Judaism and Christianity.
Fard's racializing of Islamic beliefs is part of the widespread preoccupation with racial theory and eugenics among many people from various backgrounds at the time. The common white supremacist idea that Black people were somehow less evolved than whites is turned around so that Black people become the original uncorrupted peoples of the world and whites are defined as a degenerate offshoot of them, just as Muslims claim that Judaism and Christianity are corrupted offshoots of Islam itself. According to Fard, Yakub's progeny were destined to dominate the world for six thousand years, before the original Black peoples once more regained power. This process had begun in 1914 and Fard had been sent to proclaim it.
Fard's followers were given Arabic names to replace those that had originated in slavery. Fard offered Blacks a credo of moral and cultural superiority to their White oppressors. His birthdate is celebrated today by the Nation of Islam as Savior's Day.
According to FBI records, Fard (pronounced "fuh-RAHD") Muhammad is identical to one Wallace Dodd Ford, also known as Wallace Dodd, whose birth is recorded by the FBI as February 25, 1891, of mixed European and Polynesian parentage. It is uncertain whether he was born in New Zealand or in Portland, Oregon, of parents who came from Hawaii. A recent researcher believes that Dodd was a New Zealander of half-Indian descent, born in 1893.
Isn't that something?! I had no idea... I always assumed he was multigenerationaly mixed, directly mulatto or quadroon.
I wonder if these black militant NOI members know this. I mean the average ones standing on street corners selling The Final Call and bean pies, not the ones in the top eschilans of power in that organization. I've heard them harp (haven't we all?) about Christianity being the "evil" white man's religion. All along, their OWN NOI founder was half white and void of black ancestry completely! That's a riot...lol
According to FBI records, Fard (pronounced "fuh-RAHD") Muhammad is identical to one Wallace Dodd Ford, also known as Wallace Dodd, whose birth is recorded by the FBI as February 25, 1891, of mixed European and Polynesian parentage. It is uncertain whether he was born in New Zealand or in Portland, Oregon, of parents who came from Hawaii. A recent researcher believes that Dodd was a New Zealander of half-Indian descent, born in 1893.
Isn't that something?! I had no idea... I always assumed he was multigenerationaly mixed, directly mulatto or quadroon.
I wonder if these black militant NOI members know this. I mean the average ones standing on street corners selling The Final Call and bean pies, not the ones in the top eschilans of power in that organization. I've heard them harp (haven't we all?) about Christianity being the "evil" white man's religion. All along, their OWN NOI founder was half white and void of black ancestry completely! That's a riot...lol
Just too much...
Thank you for this additional information Ty.
reading about Fard like was kinda 'scary' and even how they see him, it seems like it's almost divine
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 {Posts: 110 } Location: chicago
Posted: Fri 21 Oct 2005 15:33 Post subject:
gemini072 wrote:
zsana wrote:
Quote:
According to FBI records, Fard (pronounced "fuh-RAHD") Muhammad is identical to one Wallace Dodd Ford, also known as Wallace Dodd, whose birth is recorded by the FBI as February 25, 1891, of mixed European and Polynesian parentage. It is uncertain whether he was born in New Zealand or in Portland, Oregon, of parents who came from Hawaii. A recent researcher believes that Dodd was a New Zealander of half-Indian descent, born in 1893.
Isn't that something?! I had no idea... I always assumed he was multigenerationaly mixed, directly mulatto or quadroon.
I wonder if these black militant NOI members know this. I mean the average ones standing on street corners selling The Final Call and bean pies, not the ones in the top eschilans of power in that organization. I've heard them harp (haven't we all?) about Christianity being the "evil" white man's religion. All along, their OWN NOI founder was half white and void of black ancestry completely! That's a riot...lol
Just too much...
Thank you for this additional information Ty.
reading about Fard like was kinda 'scary' and even how they see him, it seems like it's almost divine
did you get this info from the book "the messenger " by Karl Evanz
According to FBI records, Fard (pronounced "fuh-RAHD") Muhammad is identical to one Wallace Dodd Ford, also known as Wallace Dodd, whose birth is recorded by the FBI as February 25, 1891, of mixed European and Polynesian parentage. It is uncertain whether he was born in New Zealand or in Portland, Oregon, of parents who came from Hawaii. A recent researcher believes that Dodd was a New Zealander of half-Indian descent, born in 1893.
Isn't that something?! I had no idea... I always assumed he was multigenerationaly mixed, directly mulatto or quadroon.
I wonder if these black militant NOI members know this. I mean the average ones standing on street corners selling The Final Call and bean pies, not the ones in the top eschilans of power in that organization. I've heard them harp (haven't we all?) about Christianity being the "evil" white man's religion. All along, their OWN NOI founder was half white and void of black ancestry completely! That's a riot...lol
Just too much...
Thank you for this additional information Ty.
reading about Fard like was kinda 'scary' and even how they see him, it seems like it's almost divine
did you get this info from the book "the messenger " by Karl Evanz
Joined: 04 May 2005 {Posts: 2021 } Location: santiago, chile
Posted: Sat 22 Oct 2005 13:24 Post subject: Re: Can you believe that there are people who ascribe to this?
gera2561 wrote:
Abraham told our Holy Black Brothers and Sisters that if they did not stop their rebellious ways and take heed to his teachings, which was entire submission to the Will of Allah (God), that in the year 8,400, as was predicted, a child by the name of "Yakub", commonly known as "Jacob" in the Bible, would be born and that he would make a people who would rule over them, a people who would deal with them cruelly, a people who would show no mercy, but would show or cause malignity among them.
....
A good place to start for reference would be "Liberia". We know that Mr. Yakub set up a rigorous birth control system at the beginning of his civilization, by dividing the brown babies from the black, the brown from the reds, the reds from the yellow. Now bear in mind these are only the major solutions, for there were nine more lighter colors that came after these.
...
The doctor's job was to take blood tests of the people who wanted to be married; if two Black people came to be married, he would pass them without question, but if a Black man and a Sister of light complexion tried to get married, he ( the doctor) would go behind a screen, come back and tell them there were defects in their blood (serpent liar).
....
The point is that thousands of years ago, Yakub was a renegade black scientist who created the white man. I dare to say this because of what I feel is the truth. This kind of teaching and wording by the NOI is no better than that by white supremacists. They both put out strange and far fetched teachings and fables to illustrate their hateful beliefs.
Hi,
I found that myth fascinating.
I am an amatheur Science Fiction writer and I had the opportunity of using the myth of Yakub in one of my tales. Actually I wrote it to pull the legs of some legendary Argentinean writers of SciFi that are very selfish and believe they know everything about the world.
I re-wrote the tale of the Atlantis which is an story that has been used by Nazis in their idiotic fantasies. The idea of Thule, the mythic nordic island were the white man originated was re-told in my tale. I showed in there as the white man appeared, created by an scientist called YAKUB
I send the tale to them with the intention of being criticized. They said I was a racist and so and so. And finally I told them the original Yakub myth was created by the U.S. Black nationalists! Those Argentinean writers, friend of mine, were Soooo upset with me you could not believe it. They felt ignorants. Well, that was the effect I wanted to produce
Anyways. I find that myth of Yakub is a good tale of science fiction. Actually, I consider it a classic.
Negroes hate "The White Man" but love his genes, especially when they come in nubile feminine flesh.
What an utterly disgusting thing to say. You've just libeled an entire group of people. Have you no shame? Shades of "Birth of a Nation" and any other trash that proclaims that "Negroes" want only a white women. So, when white men marry Negro, Asian, or any other non-white women what does that say to you?
Why do I always feel the need to shower after reading one of your posts?
One more thing, A.D., what does it say about all of those light-skinned black/multiracial white women who marry "Negroes"? Does it mean that they lust for the deep, blue black Negro masculine flesh?
Not only do you have a low, bigoted opinion of "black" men but you also hold "light-skinned" black women in equal or lesser regard. First, you deny them the right to label themselves and then you make them seem as if they are docile creatures who can't decide whom to marry and are just victims!
Triguy, I agree that A.D.'s remarks denigrate Blacks. Others in this discussion group habitually denigrate Whites. How do you think Viola Liuzzo's children (or the parents of Michael Schwerner and Andy Goodman) would feel after reading girlfromthenc's breathtakingly ignorant and offensive post of Tue 25 Oct 2005 19:35 at http://backintyme.com/ODR/viewtopic.php?t=1049?
The point is that, although offensive to some and perhaps inaccurate, such remarks merely express disdain towards anonymous societies. They do not personally attack another member of this discussion group. Your remarks clearly do. I have warned you about this sort of thing in the past. I will not warn you again. The next time you flame another member, your posting privilege will be suspended. No more warnings.
Triguy, I agree that A.D.'s remarks denigrate Blacks. Others in this discussion group habitually denigrate Whites. How do you think Viola Liuzzo's children (or the parents of Michael Schwerner and Andy Goodman) would feel after reading girlfromthenc's breathtakingly ignorant and offensive post of Tue 25 Oct 2005 19:35 at http://backintyme.com/ODR/viewtopic.php?t=1049?
Well your very OWN post was a PERSONAL attack upon me! And if I thought you were somewhat human I'd demand an apology! The very reason such post are written in the first place is because equally ignorant post by Barbara and A.D. are common place and allowed regularly, therefore every other member believes he or she is therefore allowed the same curtesy to be RUDE
(If general attacks on "Black non-members" or allowed White non-members should be fair game too- TO EVERYONE).
How do you think Viola Liuzzo's children (or the parents of Michael Schwerner and Andy Goodman) would feel after reading girlfromthenc's breathtakingly ignorant and offensive post of Tue 25 Oct 2005 19:35 at http://backintyme.com/ODR/viewtopic.php?t=1049?
girlfromthenc wrote:
if I thought you were somewhat human I'd demand an apology!
The first quote, above, criticizes a post. The second quote, above, criticises an individual. Surely, you can see the difference between criticizing someone's writing and criticizing someone's person (ad hominem). My kids learned that difference by age 7. Look, I will not debate policy with you. The rules of this discussion group are openly published to everyone. Live within them or leave.
(Triguy's post simply pionted out something IGNORANT said about Black men in A.D.'s post too! Not an attack on an individual ) And I'm certain that isn't the only thing your children probably learned by age 7!
Anyway, I'm done with it now that I've spoken up for myself! I'm sure all the people who frequent this message board are quite amused by all the things said on here! I'll let everyone continue to be a cautionary tale to what happens in "mixed" societies!
Why do I always feel the need to shower after reading one of your posts?
I'm glad its not just me. I was afraid to say something, but many on this site (Powel in particular) seem to have a very low opinion of black people, and regularly make gross insulting generalizations i.e : "blacks do this", "blacks do that", "blacks have self hate", "blacks are the heart of the ODR". But i'll stop talking before I get banned.
Posted: Fri 28 Oct 2005 16:30 Post subject: generalizations
Generalizations are made about "whites" all the time, as in "White people decided blacks were inferior," or "White people stole this land from the Indians." These generalizations are common throughout American society. Rarely does anyone bother to point out that not every single "white" individual fits the negative description.
Much of the outrage about negative group generalizations appears to depend on two things: 1) the social insecurity of the group and 2) the political power of the group. Americans are taught to be very sensitive to negative comments about blacks, Jews and, to a lesser extent, American Indians and Hispanics. If I were to say, "The Vikings pilaged and raped throughout Europe," few Scandinavian Americans would feel threatened by that. Few German Americans feel threatened by the militaristic "Nazi" stereotype that came out of WWII. They are not socially insecure. By contrast, if I point out that there is a contradiction between the common "black" practice of rejecting intermarriage and family ties with "whites" while at the same time claiming the obvious descendants of whites as "black," you know what happens (I have posted several examples of this phenomenon).
On the other hand, a vulnerable group without political power can be generally insulted with impunity, as in "Mulatto slaves despised blacks and worshipped whites" or "Gypsies are all thieves."
If you read most critical accounts of the multiracial movement (including those that are supposed to be "scholarly"), you will find that broad generalizations are made without naming organizations or individuals active in the movement. This gives the writer a free hand to attribute to the movement any actions or motivations that he pleases.
Here's an example of this deliberate mischaracterization of the Multiracial Movement from best-selling "white black" author Danzy Senna:
Quote:
One of the things I’m sort of wary of in the multiracial movement is a denial of the persistence of racism. In this Tiger Woods model, we’re all just happy to be mixed, and we’re so cute and we’re so Benetton. There are still issues that you confront being mixed. There are really difficult experiences that you have if you appear white and you’re not white
I know of no person or organization active in the Multiracial Movement who ever said that racism suddenly ceased to exist. I believe the truth is that Danzy Senna is uncomfortable because we criticize black society and don't follow the "blame whites for everything" philosophy so typical of the cultural "left." We have solutions to her discomfort with her "white" phenotype and partial "black blood," she just doesn't want to hear them (nor does she want others to hear them).
I'm glad its not just me. I was afraid to say something, but many on this site (Powel in particular) seem to have a very low opinion of black people, and regularly make gross insulting generalizations i.e : "blacks do this", "blacks do that", "blacks have self hate", "blacks are the heart of the ODR". But i'll stop talking before I get banned.
As I told girlfromthenc, no one is insisting that you (or anyone else) participate in this discussion group. Its rules are simple and openly published. If you find yourself so offended and upset at others' words that you cannot maintain decorum, please leave. You will be happier and so will the other members.
As administrator I have two choices when it comes to statements that are "insulting generalizations" of groups. I can allow all of them or ban all of them. If I ban all statements that might be construed as insulting to some group somewhere, we would have no intellectual discourse at all. So I allow "insulting generalizations" of groups, especially if no one has argued that they are inaccurate. But I draw the line at anyone insulting another individual member.
Some sincerely feel that it would be better to allow "insulting generalizations" of Whites but not of Blacks, or vice-versa. I disagree and, not to put too fine point on it, I make the rules and there is no appeal. Live with them or leave.
Others feel even more strongly that if a group to which they feel allegiance is subjected to an "insulting generalization," then they have the right to personally insult another member. Wrong again. Do this and your posting privileges will be suspended.
Finally, a few individuals believe with the utmost conviction that they alone should be the ultimate arbiters of what is allowed. I ask such people to please, please go away and form their own discussion group where they can make their own rules.
This should not be hard to understand. Do not insult another member. Period. No excuses. No matter what they write.
=======
On a different intellectual level, let me point out that many posts in this discussion group can be challenged on intellectual grounds, especially AD's contention that the U.S. Black culture suffers from a psychopathology of conflicted approach/avoidance obsession with what they perceive as Whiteness. In fact, AD's suggestion is a frequent topic in the Journal of Black Studies. And, like any other assertion, it can be challenged. Members challenge others' claims all the time. My own posts are often challenged and I often try to refute those of others. And most members who refute a post do it intellectually, by citing contradictory evidence or by showing logical flaws in the argument.
But a few people, for some reason, cannot summon intellectual arguments and so they resort to ad hominem attacks instead. They justify this barbarity by claiming that they were offended because their group was insulted. I do not want such people participating here. Those who fit this pattern are welcome to lurk and read and learn, but should not post. Please, please do not post here merely to express disagreement with another member unless you can come up with a reasoned refutation of what they wrote. That you feel very strongly about it is irrelevant.
11It is an old leprosy in the skin of his flesh, and the priest shall pronounce him unclean, and shall not shut him up: for he is unclean. 12And if a leprosy break out abroad in the skin, and the leprosy cover all the skin of him that hath the plague from his head even to his foot, wheresoever the priest looketh; 13Then the priest shall consider: and, behold, if the leprosy have covered all his flesh, he shall pronounce him clean that hath the plague: it is all turned white: he is clean.
Caucasians are clean lepers...
Leviticus 13:30
Then the priest shall see the plague: and, behold, if it be in sight deeper than the skin; and there be in it a yellow thin hair; then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a dry scall, even a leprosy upon the head or beard.
Blonde Hair....
Leviticus 14:34
When ye be come into the land of Canaan, which I give to you for a possession, and I put the plague of leprosy in a house of the land of your possession;
Canaanites w/ the plague. Now look at whaat happens to people who are leprous...
Exodus 4:6
And the LORD said furthermore unto him, Put now thine hand into thy bosom. And he put his hand into his bosom: and when he took it out, behold, his hand was leprous as snow.
Moses's Hand....
Numbers 12:10
And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and, behold, Miriam became leprous, white as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam, and, behold, she was leprous.
Moses's Sister....
2 Kings 5:27
The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow.
'
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in
