The Study of Racialism Forum Index
The Study of Racialism
Discussion of U.S. Racialism
Please read The Rules before posting.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch     RegisterRegister 
   Log inLog in 
'

WAS ARISTOTLE BLACK?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> International Stories
Author Message
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 242 }

PostPosted: Fri 17 Oct 2008 10:29    Post subject: WAS ARISTOTLE BLACK? Reply with quote



What is the meaning of this Arabic image showing a black skinned Aristotle? Was Aristotle Black? Did he have lots and lots of drops of African blood? Did he have African ancestors? Were they SSA or Caucasian? What might have been his skull index? Would his looks make other Africans consider him one of theirs? Would people come up to him and ask where he was from? Or ask him when the hell he will be going back to Africa? Was dear Aristotle a real person, or a publishing company?

Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment
current 01:07, 10 February 2006 1,064×1,563 (620 KB) Laurascudder (Talk | contribs) (Aristotle teaching, from document in the British Library. From: {{book reference|Title=Islamic Science: An Illustrated Study| Author=Seyyed Hossein Nasr|Publisher=World of Islam Festival Publishing Ltd.|Year=1976| ID=ISBN 090503502X}} [[Category:Aristotle])

Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Arabic_aristotle.jpg
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2992 }

PostPosted: Fri 17 Oct 2008 13:02    Post subject: Reply with quote

It isn't clear from that picture that the darker of the two is supposed to be Aristotle.
Back to top
divana
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
{Posts: 119 }
Location: Somewhere...

PostPosted: Sun 19 Oct 2008 10:05    Post subject: Reply with quote

But no one was black or white back then right?
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 5376 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Sun 19 Oct 2008 13:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

divana wrote:
But no one was black or white back then right?

There were people back then of sub-saharan ancestry and/or appearance. They were just not seen as belonging to a mandatory endogamous group.
Back to top
divana
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 10 Aug 2006
{Posts: 119 }
Location: Somewhere...

PostPosted: Mon 20 Oct 2008 00:43    Post subject: Reply with quote

fwsweet wrote:
divana wrote:
But no one was black or white back then right?

There were people back then of sub-saharan ancestry and/or appearance. They were just not seen as belonging to a mandatory endogamous group.


Exactly!
Back to top
onlyhuman77
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
{Posts: 187 }
Location: Harlem, NYC

PostPosted: Mon 20 Oct 2008 18:36    Post subject: Reply with quote

This could just be my thinking but knowing an ancient historical figure's phenotype such as Aristotle has little influence on me suddenly taking an interest in that person.
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2992 }

PostPosted: Mon 20 Oct 2008 18:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

For some people that makes him worth knowing about.
Back to top
onlyhuman77
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
{Posts: 187 }
Location: Harlem, NYC

PostPosted: Mon 20 Oct 2008 18:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

G-Man wrote:
For some people that makes him worth knowing about.


Hopefully not a major determining factor
Back to top
abu isabella
New User
New User


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
{Posts: 25 }

PostPosted: Tue 21 Oct 2008 22:57    Post subject: Not to burst anyone's bubble, however... Reply with quote

Aristotle lived from 384 BC – 322 BC. This manuscript is an Islamic document so it comes from the 600's AD at the very oldest. So it was drawn at least 900+ years after Aristotle died.

Here is a more contemporary sculpture of him, complete with info about the sculpture and Aristotle.
Back to top
abu isabella
New User
New User


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
{Posts: 25 }

PostPosted: Tue 21 Oct 2008 22:59    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is the site it came from.
picasaweb.google.com/.../2dRbxldxJDR7hFwpmRNC4w
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 242 }

PostPosted: Wed 22 Oct 2008 11:41    Post subject: Reply with quote

onlyhuman77 wrote:
G-Man wrote:
For some people that makes him worth knowing about.


Hopefully not a major determining factor


Dear, I have this idea that my efforts by talking about the other role's of Black's in Europe (1500-1789), people of colour might take more interest in this historical stuff and images like these too, previously considered 'White people stuff.' Which they pay for anyway in taxes for upkeep. Like listening to Van Beethoven, who I consider a dark mulatto-type and going to recitals. Here a quote from my posting on egyptsearch.com, where I have a home away from ODRhome.

In response to Divana: The idea of skin colour in connection to race is fairly new.

Quote:
Originally posted by Egmond Codfried:
[QB]

[A Moor. J. van Streeck (1619-1673)]

Over the weekend I read some references to Appiah (1992), Malik and Nederveen Pieterse by R. Reedijk (2000) which state that only around 1770 the Black was found to be inferior based on his looks. That only at the beginning of the nineteenth century race was seen in connection to colour.

In my own research: Late eighteen century, pre-revolutionary France, needed 'scientific evidence' to discredit the Blue Blood (=Black Blood) myth, symbolised by a Moor, a Classical African. So all the hatred went just against this symbol of despotic oppression: the Moor.

Somehow I see old cultures only rising when different peoples start pooling their resources.
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 242 }

PostPosted: Wed 22 Oct 2008 13:56    Post subject: Reply with quote



[Plato and Aristotle by Raphael (1511)]

There is a noticeable difference in colour between these two men. See more of the whole image below. There were perhaps traditions that Aristotle was Black of skin. Snowden wrote in 'Blacks in Antiquity' about Classical definitions of Blacks and images of Blacks in the Greek, Roman and Early Christian World. Did he include images of Aristotle? I was familiar with 'snub-nosed' and 'black skinned' images of Socrates, but Aristotle is new to me. Interesting, all these (seemingly) Blacks cornering the Philosophy market!

detail http://lh4.ggpht.com/_FGGA3FhV9xo/SJRllv8tNnI/AAAAAAAABK8/RYq2jOkTzMA/Vatican+Museum+-Aristotle+and+Plato+2.JPG
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 242 }

PostPosted: Wed 22 Oct 2008 15:05    Post subject: Re: Not to burst anyone's bubble, however... Reply with quote

abu isabella wrote:
Aristotle lived from 384 BC – 322 BC. This manuscript is an Islamic document so it comes from the 600's AD at the very oldest. So it was drawn at least 900+ years after Aristotle died.

Here is a more contemporary sculpture of him, complete with info about the sculpture and Aristotle.
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_R_JEdpYPLzM/SH8lcl39lsI/AAAAAAAABVY/uXT6EuRQrPY/P2160103.JPG[/img]


WHAT´S YOUR POINT, HONEY.
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 5376 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Wed 22 Oct 2008 15:48    Post subject: Re: Not to burst anyone's bubble, however... Reply with quote

Egmond Codfried wrote:
WHAT´S YOUR POINT, HONEY.

The point is that the paintings are as imaginary as paintings of Santa Clause or of the Tooth Fairy.

Three warnings:

(1) Use respectful language. The use of "honey" above is a form of ad homnem.

(2) Keep you voice down. The upper-case above is childish.

(3) Stop posting your blue-blood = black-blood speculation anywhere but in the threads designated for this topic. The next time you do it your posting privilege will be suspended without warning. If this is some sort of a contest to see how many threads you can force me to split off by injecting your speculation everywhere, stop it now.
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2992 }

PostPosted: Wed 22 Oct 2008 16:18    Post subject: Reply with quote

Umm, still trying to figure out which of the two in the Islamic/Arabic depiction is supposed to be Aristotle.
Back to top
onlyhuman77
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
{Posts: 187 }
Location: Harlem, NYC

PostPosted: Wed 22 Oct 2008 20:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

Egmond Codfried wrote:
onlyhuman77 wrote:
G-Man wrote:
For some people that makes him worth knowing about.


Hopefully not a major determining factor


Dear, I have this idea that my efforts by talking about the other role's of Black's in Europe (1500-1789), people of colour might take more interest in this historical stuff and images like these too, previously considered 'White people stuff.' Which they pay for anyway in taxes for upkeep. Like listening to Van Beethoven, who I consider a dark mulatto-type and going to recitals. Here a quote from my posting on egyptsearch.com, where I have a home away from ODRhome.

In response to Divana: The idea of skin colour in connection to race is fairly new.

Quote:
Originally posted by Egmond Codfried:
[QB]

[A Moor. J. van Streeck (1619-1673)]

Over the weekend I read some references to Appiah (1992), Malik and Nederveen Pieterse by R. Reedijk (2000) which state that only around 1770 the Black was found to be inferior based on his looks. That only at the beginning of the nineteenth century race was seen in connection to colour.

In my own research: Late eighteen century, pre-revolutionary France, needed 'scientific evidence' to discredit the Blue Blood (=Black Blood) myth, symbolised by a Moor, a Classical African. So all the hatred went just against this symbol of despotic oppression: the Moor.

Somehow I see old cultures only rising when different peoples start pooling their resources.


I have never taken a sudden interest in any ancient historical figure because of new findings about their phenotype, it holds little validity for me. If I wasn't interested before, I guarantee I will not be interested after.

I have heard many arguments about "Jesus" from the Bible in regards to his phenotype. I am a believer in GOD but the phenotype of "Jesus" has no influence on my love of GOD.

I will confess, I do take interest in people that have some of my characteristics, but that has little to do with my phenotype and more to do with my crazy view of a crazy world.
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 242 }

PostPosted: Thu 23 Oct 2008 12:31    Post subject: Reply with quote



[Aristotle]



It's a good thing onlyhuman77 uses the word 'I' eight times in his last posting, so it's clear he is only speaking for himself.

The idea that one would only take interest in a celebrity because he is from the same race is racist. Yet I have studied photographs of Black American artist where they look White and blond. Nat King Cole, was according to a documentary, obliged by the producers to wear white make up in his short lived TV Show. To me it looks that these Black artist do not want to frighten away White fans with their Black looks.

Not to want to discuss the possibility that Aristotle might have been, what we came to call Black, strikes me as strange. For me the bottom-line would be to have as many as possible people to take interest in Aristotle, by all means necessary.

Lastly a little word of caution to other users. Their is a lot of deception going on on the internet, like people presenting a totally fake identity to the world. They seem to get their rocks off when they have fooled you and tripped you up. At another site someone is using twenty nicks at the same time.


Source image: http://www.cnr.edu/home/bmcmanus/poetics.html

BLACK OR WHITE?

http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=000663


Last edited by Egmond Codfried on Thu 23 Oct 2008 15:02; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 242 }

PostPosted: Thu 23 Oct 2008 12:54    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frank M. Snowden, Blacks in Antiquity, Harvard University press, Massachusetts, 1970 offers the name of Aristotle on six pages, but nothing about his looks or a portrait. Socrates is not even listed.

Still it might be of interest to learn from this work that Aristotle and Pliny preserved a Greek proverb ´Africa is always producing something new.´ Aristotle commented on slavery and justified it on the basis of innate differences and capabilities of individuals. However this should be understood in the Hellenistic sense which emphasized a cultural rather than a racial difference.

Aristotle attributes the straight hair of the Scythians and Thracians to a fluid, moist atmosphere and the woolly hair of Ethiops, meaning Black Africans in general, to their dry environments.

Along with several notes on the Ethiops we can say that the average Greek had a well known knowledge of this physical type. Aristotle made references to race mixture between Greeks and Ethiops. If I understand well he was the first of many. In Classic Literature, Plutarch and Pliney were like Aristotle interested in the transmission of the physical characters of descendent of Black/White crosses. But they included nothing regarding certain modern strictures on miscegenation.
Back to top
onlyhuman77
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
{Posts: 187 }
Location: Harlem, NYC

PostPosted: Thu 23 Oct 2008 18:22    Post subject: Reply with quote

Egmond Codfried wrote:


It's a good thing onlyhuman77 uses the word 'I' eight times in his last posting, so it's clear he is only speaking for himself.

The idea that one would only take interest in a celebrity because he is from the same race is racist. Yet I have studied photographs of Black American artist where they look White and blond. Nat King Cole, was according to a documentary, obliged by the producers to wear white make up in his short lived TV Show. To me it looks that these Black artist do not want to frighten away White fans with their Black looks.

Not to want to discuss the possibility that Aristotle might have been, what we came to call Black, strikes me as strange. For me the bottom-line would be to have as many as possible people to take interest in Aristotle, by all means necessary.


There are some brown complexioned Greeks (which is the culture Aristotle grew up under), Italians, Middle Easterns, Indians, Asians, as well as Polynesians. Some of those cultures have some degree of African DNA admixture others do not, does that mean people of African Ancestry should take an interest in the brown complexioned historical figures of those cultures?

If Aristotle was a brown complexioned Greek with a significant amount of African ancestry he is still under the Greek umbrella. Aristotle's anecstry could also be from one of those cultures mentioned above with brown complexion but no detectable racial admixture at all.

There are Greeks today that have tanned brown complexions, not a great deal but there are some. Racially a few might check Other (and might write in Greek), while the vast majority check off Caucasian, but I don't believe any would check of African, African-American (if in the U.S) or Black.
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 242 }

PostPosted: Fri 24 Oct 2008 14:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

Egmond Codfried wrote:


Lastly a little word of caution to other users. Their is a lot of deception going on on the internet, like people presenting a totally fake identity to the world. They seem to get their rocks off when they have fooled you and tripped you up. At another site someone is using twenty nicks at the same time.


One stumbles on images of Socrates which shows a Black looking man, but before we can just adress this image and find out what the hell it means, one has to deal with a lot of strange garbage. I have posted some words of Snowden to put this find in its historical perspective. There is no need to project present racial obsessions on such a thing to understand it.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> International Stories All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group