The Study of Racialism Forum Index
The Study of Racialism
Discussion of U.S. Racialism
Please read The Rules before posting.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch     RegisterRegister 
   Log inLog in 
'

Interracial couple denied marriage license in La.
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> History of the U.S. Color Line
Author Message
gemini072
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2942 }

PostPosted: Fri 16 Oct 2009 02:01    Post subject: Interracial couple denied marriage license in La. Reply with quote

I had to post this and the appropriate forum is not available

Interracial couple denied marriage license in La.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091015/ap_on_re_us/us_interracial_rebuff



By MARY FOSTER, Associated Press Writer Mary Foster, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 57 mins ago
NEW ORLEANS – A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way," Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. "I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else."

Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple. If they are, he does not marry them, he said.

Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.

"There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage," Bardwell said. "I think those children suffer and I won't help put them through it."

If he did an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.

"I try to treat everyone equally," he said.

Bardwell estimates that he has refused to marry about four couples during his career, all in the past 2 1/2 years.

Beth Humphrey, 30, and 32-year-old Terence McKay, both of Hammond, say they will consult the U.S. Justice Department about filing a discrimination complaint.

Humphrey, an account manager for a marketing firm, said she and McKay, a welder, just returned to Louisiana. She is white and he is black. She plans to enroll in the University of New Orleans to pursue a masters degree in minority politics.

"That was one thing that made this so unbelievable," she said. "It's not something you expect in this day and age."

Humphrey said she called Bardwell on Oct. 6 to inquire about getting a marriage license signed. She says Bardwell's wife told her that Bardwell will not sign marriage licenses for interracial couples. Bardwell suggested the couple go to another justice of the peace in the parish who agreed to marry them.

"We are looking forward to having children," Humphrey said. "And all our friends and co-workers have been very supportive. Except for this, we're typical happy newlyweds."

"It is really astonishing and disappointing to see this come up in 2009," said American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana attorney Katie Schwartzmann. She said the Supreme Court ruled in 1967 "that the government cannot tell people who they can and cannot marry."

The ACLU sent a letter to the Louisiana Judiciary Committee, which oversees the state justices of the peace, asking them to investigate Bardwell and recommending "the most severe sanctions available, because such blatant bigotry poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the administration of justice."

"He knew he was breaking the law, but continued to do it," Schwartzmann said.

According to the clerk of court's office, application for a marriage license must be made three days before the ceremony because there is a 72-hour waiting period. The applicants are asked if they have previously been married. If so, they must show how the marriage ended, such as divorce.

Other than that, all they need is a birth certificate and Social Security card.

The license fee is $35, and the license must be signed by a Louisiana minister, justice of the peace or judge. The original is returned to the clerk's office.

"I've been a justice of the peace for 34 years and I don't think I've mistreated anybody," Bardwell said. "I've made some mistakes, but you have too. I didn't tell this couple they couldn't get married. I just told them I wouldn't do it."

(This version corrects the date of the Supreme Court ruling.))
Back to top
Dragon Horse
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 07 Feb 2007
{Posts: 1829 }
Location: Lookin DC Metro, Feelin Geneva

PostPosted: Fri 16 Oct 2009 12:39    Post subject: Reply with quote

He needs to do some jail time.
Back to top
Creole GAL
Wizard
Wizard


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
{Posts: 433 }

PostPosted: Fri 16 Oct 2009 13:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of all the problems in Louisiana,real problems like the U.S.gets the money from off shore drilling off LA in the Gulfand LA gets nil due to bad ,dumb, greedy polictians Long and company, of all of the problmes in LA like the levees were faulty surrounding N.O, because bad, dumb, politicians, all of the problmes that LA has like North LA not accepting of the New Orleans which supports the state,
THIS problem of giving marriage licenses to some people and not others,is problem.
Good God. You reallly have to laugh.This JotP,unbelievable.
He just got away with this for so long.

Now,is this legal? Can a Justice of the Peace deny people on how he/she feels? A JotP is a civil servant, correct?
He has had a long time doing this.
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 5380 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Fri 16 Oct 2009 14:37    Post subject: Re: Interracial couple denied marriage license in La. Reply with quote

gemini072 wrote:
I had to post this and the appropriate forum is not available

Actually, I think that this is the best forum anyway. The issue strikes at the very heart of the U.S. endogamous color line, what it has meant since its invention in 1691, and what it continues to mean today: disapproval of intermarriage across the "racial" divide.

FWIW, Mary Lee watched a TV interview with the prospective groom and reports that he has a strong Spanish accent. This may explain why he was oblivious to both Black and White American's opposition to intermarriage.

As to whether the JP can be subjected to any legal punishment, I doubt it very much. At most, he could be the target of a writ of mandamus civil suit, to get an injunction ordering him to do his job. But such suits are exceedingly hard to win, since they requires one judge to rule that another judge is willfully and without cause refusing to perform a duty. Like most such situations, it will come down to public opinion. If most of Hammond's voters (Black and White) agree that intermarriage is bad, then he is scott free. If most of Hammond's voters are swayed by the disgust against the JP's racialism expressed by national commentators, then he is toast.
Back to top
anonymouse
Wizard
Wizard


Joined: 09 Oct 2007
{Posts: 677 }

PostPosted: Fri 16 Oct 2009 20:49    Post subject: Reply with quote

i posted it in Ethnicity in America


this is a picture of the groom

Back to top
kpauljohnson
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 24 May 2007
{Posts: 129 }
Location: Danville, VA

PostPosted: Sat 17 Oct 2009 00:54    Post subject: Bill Burton, WH Deputy Press Secretary, weighs in Reply with quote

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/white-house-weighs-in-on-justice-who-wont-marry-interracial-couples.php?ref=fpb

From seeing him on TV I had wondered about his ethnicity, thinking he could be MGM or first generation biracial; this article answers that question.
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 5380 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Sat 17 Oct 2009 01:07    Post subject: Re: Bill Burton, WH Deputy Press Secretary, weighs in Reply with quote

kpauljohnson wrote:
From seeing him on TV I had wondered about his ethnicity, thinking he could be MGM or first generation biracial; this article answers that question.

How so? The linked-to article (about the White House press secretary) does not mention the would-be groom's ancestry.
Back to top
kpauljohnson
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 24 May 2007
{Posts: 129 }
Location: Danville, VA

PostPosted: Sat 17 Oct 2009 02:16    Post subject: Re: Bill Burton, WH Deputy Press Secretary, weighs in Reply with quote

fwsweet wrote:
kpauljohnson wrote:
From seeing him on TV I had wondered about his ethnicity, thinking he could be MGM or first generation biracial; this article answers that question.

How so? The linked-to article (about the White House press secretary) does not mention the would-be groom's ancestry.


By "him" I was referring to Burton who is described as biracial. Perhaps I'm confused about specifying a new "post subject" vs. staying with the existing"thread subject" and leaving "post subject" blank.
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 5380 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Sat 17 Oct 2009 03:01    Post subject: Re: Bill Burton, WH Deputy Press Secretary, weighs in Reply with quote

kpauljohnson wrote:
By "him" I was referring to Burton who is described as biracial. Perhaps I'm confused about specifying a new "post subject" vs. staying with the existing"thread subject" and leaving "post subject" blank.

Oh. Sorry. My fault. I did not notice your message's subject.
Back to top
DucorpsToo
Mentor
Mentor


Joined: 19 Jan 2006
{Posts: 223 }
Location: Southern California

PostPosted: Sat 17 Oct 2009 05:10    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read that one in the paper today. Pity. To bad he can't do some time..

Quote:
"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way,"


Gee, how many times have I heard variants of the above quote..Both statements seem quite contradictory...
Back to top
kpauljohnson
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 24 May 2007
{Posts: 129 }
Location: Danville, VA

PostPosted: Sat 17 Oct 2009 20:41    Post subject: "I'm not an X, but..." Reply with quote

DucorpsToo wrote:
I read that one in the paper today. Pity. To bad he can't do some time..

Quote:
"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way,"


Gee, how many times have I heard variants of the above quote..Both statements seem quite contradictory...


And it's not just about race. "I'm not a sexist, but woman's place is in the home. I'm not a religious bigot, but Muslims have no place in Congress." And so it goes. People rarely will cop to unflattering descriptions of themselves no matter how blatantly accurate they are.
Back to top
Dragon Horse
SuperMentor
SuperMentor


Joined: 07 Feb 2007
{Posts: 1829 }
Location: Lookin DC Metro, Feelin Geneva

PostPosted: Mon 19 Oct 2009 17:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/keith-bardwell-explains-r_n_325758.html

This guy sounds like he is not very bright. The governor of Louisiana has called for his punishment and firing.
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2992 }

PostPosted: Mon 14 Dec 2009 18:48    Post subject: Reply with quote

DucorpsToo wrote:
I read that one in the paper today. Pity. To bad he can't do some time..

Quote:
"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way,"


Gee, how many times have I heard variants of the above quote..Both statements seem quite contradictory...


Not necessarily. One can support marriage exclusively within one's tribe and still have respectful relationships with other tribes. One can oppose interracial marriage on the grounds of collective self-love as opposed to hatred of outsiders.

Quote:
This guy sounds like he is not very bright. The governor of Louisiana has called for his punishment and firing.


On what grounds and what kind of punishment? Personally, I don't think he did anything that outrageous. He was opposed to "those kinds of marriages," recused himself from marrying the couple, but gave them the name and number of another JOP who would marry them. I disagree with his opinion, but his action doesn't appear to illegal; it's his reasons for the action that offend some people.
Back to top
Grasshoppa
Mentor
Mentor


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
{Posts: 248 }
Location: United States

PostPosted: Tue 15 Dec 2009 11:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way,"

I wonder if he'd say this if he learned about genetic markers, OOA, and admixture in current African Americans.
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2992 }

PostPosted: Wed 16 Dec 2009 15:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

Probably yes. Most African Americans are aware that they may have some European ancestors, but can still be opposed to "those kinds of marriages" too. I doubt your information would sway him.
Back to top
BlackHaze
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 29 Dec 2004
{Posts: 114 }

PostPosted: Wed 13 Jan 2010 03:13    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with G-Man somewhat. At one point I opposed interracial marriage, but not on the grounds of self-love. Mainly because most blacks I know personally get into interracial relationships out of self-hate. I think most AAs who oppose "those marriages" feel the same way.

On the other hand, I think some whites oppose interracial marriage because of an irrational fear of "dying out", but only when it involves blacks. I bet Bardwell would've married the couple if the guy was half native american or half Japanese.
Back to top
G-Man
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2992 }

PostPosted: Wed 13 Jan 2010 15:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

BlackHaze wrote:

On the other hand, I think some whites oppose interracial marriage because of an irrational fear of "dying out", but only when it involves blacks. I bet Bardwell would've married the couple if the guy was half native american or half Japanese.


Maybe, but then maybe not...From his comments following this "controversy," I got the impression that as a southerner, he-probably like many black people in the south-assumes interracial couple means black and white couple. It's possible a situation that involved a person like the one you described above may not have led him to recuse himself from issuing a marriage license and marrying the couple, but it is difficult to say. I'd assume that he wouldn't marry a white and Amerindian/Japanese couple either, but he would find that couple less objectionable than a black and white couple.

In the end, the issue should be about determining if he did anything illegal or unethical. Apparently he did not.
Back to top
Powell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
{Posts: 2462 }

PostPosted: Thu 14 Jan 2010 00:00    Post subject: What is an "interracial marriage"? Reply with quote

BlackHaze wrote:
I agree with G-Man somewhat. At one point I opposed interracial marriage, but not on the grounds of self-love. Mainly because most blacks I know personally get into interracial relationships out of self-hate. I think most AAs who oppose "those marriages" feel the same way.

On the other hand, I think some whites oppose interracial marriage because of an irrational fear of "dying out", but only when it involves blacks. I bet Bardwell would've married the couple if the guy was half native american or half Japanese.


If you thought blacks who married whites were guilty of self-hatred, why didn't you also oppose blacks who prided themselves on marrying mulattoes and mixed-whites with a public "black" identity? I've known "blacks" who raved against black men who marry white women, and then whined that there were "so many pretty light-skinned black (sic) girls they could marry instead." You have to give the folks who took their "miscegenation" straight credit for some guts. If I would condemn anyone, it would be the black-identified folks who rave against intermarriage but want caucasians and mulattoes labeled "black" in their beds. They want their black-identified spouses to have enough Euro DNA to lighten their children and produce "good hair," while they tell the liberals that evil white antebellum "rapists" FORCED all that "white blood" on them.
Back to top
BlackHaze
Experienced User
Experienced User


Joined: 29 Dec 2004
{Posts: 114 }

PostPosted: Thu 14 Jan 2010 02:59    Post subject: Re: What is an "interracial marriage"? Reply with quote

Powell wrote:
BlackHaze wrote:
I agree with G-Man somewhat. At one point I opposed interracial marriage, but not on the grounds of self-love. Mainly because most blacks I know personally get into interracial relationships out of self-hate. I think most AAs who oppose "those marriages" feel the same way.

On the other hand, I think some whites oppose interracial marriage because of an irrational fear of "dying out", but only when it involves blacks. I bet Bardwell would've married the couple if the guy was half native american or half Japanese.


If you thought blacks who married whites were guilty of self-hatred, why didn't you also oppose blacks who prided themselves on marrying mulattoes and mixed-whites with a public "black" identity? I've known "blacks" who raved against black men who marry white women, and then whined that there were "so many pretty light-skinned black (sic) girls they could marry instead." You have to give the folks who took their "miscegenation" straight credit for some guts. If I would condemn anyone, it would be the black-identified folks who rave against intermarriage but want caucasians and mulattoes labeled "black" in their beds. They want their black-identified spouses to have enough Euro DNA to lighten their children and produce "good hair," while they tell the liberals that evil white antebellum "rapists" FORCED all that "white blood" on them.


When blacks treat mulattoes and mixed whites as prized possessions, I see it as an issue of colorism. A subtle preference for "good hair" doesn't necessarily boil down to self-hate. The type of hatred I'm talking about is much deeper than merely assigning a lesser value to sub-saharan features. I'm talking about people who literally believe they're inferior in every sense of the word. Almost every group on the planet practices skin shade discrimination in various ways, but only blacks (from what I've observed) routinely bash co-ethnics of the opposite sex when they marry a white woman or white man.

I'm not saying that all or even most blacks are guilty of this, just the ones that I've known personally. And I do recognize the hypocrisy in worshipping mulattoes and whites with minimal black ancestry but opposing "official" misgegenation. But I can accept that people are free to marry whoever they want, for whatever reasons the want.
Back to top
Grasshoppa
Mentor
Mentor


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
{Posts: 248 }
Location: United States

PostPosted: Thu 14 Jan 2010 08:21    Post subject: Reply with quote

G-Man wrote:
Probably yes. Most African Americans are aware that they may have some European ancestors, but can still be opposed to "those kinds of marriages" too. I doubt your information would sway him.


It probably wouldn't. I can't fathom why people are so opposed to interracial dating if not for racist reasons, except maybe the possibility of problems concerning the identity of the children. That is the only sensible reason imo. Ancestral populations have mixed with other populations since the beginning of human history <-----why do people think it is so wrong now if they are aware of this?

Back to this fool. Like I said, most of his other reasons to deny them a marriage license are not really very good. It is odd to me that he has this power, to be quite frank. Would it not sound utterly stupid if I denied someone a marriage license because the bride and groom were different in some other way? For example, if I said: "I refuse because these two went to different high schools. It is my experience that people from different high schools do not stay married very long."
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> History of the U.S. Color Line All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group