Posted: Thu 19 Jun 2008 02:42 Post subject: A Functional Definition of Ethnicity
I will attempt to answer the long-standing question, "what is an ethnic group". I will try to do so because I have not found an adequate one yet. None is adequate because each involves a citerion which some group lacks, but nevertheless that group claims to be an "ethnic group", and behaves in the same manner as other groups which do fit the criterion. The exception to this pattern is "labeling". White Americans do not label themselves as an ethnic group, however, they exhibit the same behaviors as groups who do - for instance, "Black Americans".
Main Entry: 1eth·nic
Pronunciation: \ˈeth-nik\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin ethnicus, from Greek ethnikos national, gentile, from ethnos nation, people; akin to Greek ēthos custom — more at sib
Date: 15th century
1: heathen
2 a: of or relating to large groups of people classed according to common racial, national, tribal, religious, linguistic, or cultural origin or background
Problems:
- Does not define how ethnic groups behave
- Ignores that ethnic groups can exist even in minute numbers
- Implies that ethnic groups reflect biological, cultural, or linguistic reality,
and they do not. Some ethnic groups are not related to a common
ancestor. Others do not share the same culture or language. Etc.
My solution:
An "ethnic group" is a collection of two or more individuals having the following properties:
> They perceive themselves to have a common origin.
> They perceive themselves to posses a unique "innate essence"
> They practice endogamy.
> They prefer one another over out-members.
> They establish criteria for membership.
This is an open invitation to everyone to uphold or reject this definition.
If my definition is inadequate, then you should either find a direct flaw in it, or else provide evidence of an existing group of people like an ethnic-group which does not meet the definition.
Having failed to reject it, we can conclude that it works very well. For now.
Posted: Thu 19 Jun 2008 03:25 Post subject: 3.3.3 ethnicity
you can discuss but the group has already defined Ethnicity for this forum
3.3.3 ethnicity — “A group of people with a common tradition and a sense of identity that functions as a subgroup within the larger society; membership is a matter of self-identification.” [Robert F. McNergney and Joanne M. Herbert, Foundations of Education: The Challenge of Professional Practice, 3rd ed. (Boston, 2001), 549.] Synonym: ethnic self-identity. The two essential elements of ethnicity are its positioning within a hegemony and its voluntary nature. First, ethnicity denotes a group’s self-identity within a larger mainstream culture. It does not refer to mainstream national cultures themselves. For example, the customs, traditions, language, and folklore of Spaniards living in Spain are not an ethnicity; they are a national culture. But the rhetoric of unity expressed by Spanish-Americans and their descendants in the United States is an ethnicity. Second, membership in an ethnic community is voluntary and not genetically predetermined. For example, about five percent of the members of the African-American ethnic community have no detectable sub-Saharan DNA admixture, while about thirty percent of the members of the U.S. White endogamous group do have detectable sub-Saharan DNA admixture.
Posted: Thu 19 Jun 2008 03:42 Post subject: Re: 3.3.3 ethnicity
gemini072 wrote:
you can discuss but the group has already defined Ethnicity for this forum
3.3.3 ethnicity — “A group of people with a common tradition and a sense of identity that functions as a subgroup within the larger society; membership is a matter of self-identification.” [Robert F. McNergney and Joanne M. Herbert, Foundations of Education: The Challenge of Professional Practice, 3rd ed. (Boston, 2001), 549.] Synonym: ethnic self-identity. The two essential elements of ethnicity are its positioning within a hegemony and its voluntary nature. First, ethnicity denotes a group’s self-identity within a larger mainstream culture. It does not refer to mainstream national cultures themselves. For example, the customs, traditions, language, and folklore of Spaniards living in Spain are not an ethnicity; they are a national culture. But the rhetoric of unity expressed by Spanish-Americans and their descendants in the United States is an ethnicity. Second, membership in an ethnic community is voluntary and not genetically predetermined. For example, about five percent of the members of the African-American ethnic community have no detectable sub-Saharan DNA admixture, while about thirty percent of the members of the U.S. White endogamous group do have detectable sub-Saharan DNA admixture.
Second, membership in an ethnic community is voluntary and not genetically predetermined.
Of course, Americans are told almost every day by some columnist, reporter, interviewee, teacher, etc. that any "drop of black blood" makes a person in the U.S. "black." That contradicts the above, because the "membership" claimed is involuntary.
Ethnic groups have a strong tendency to corrall people into involuntary membership. Especially the blacks, along with the assistance of the rest of the United States.
Posted: Thu 19 Jun 2008 17:13 Post subject: Re: 3.3.3 ethnicity
Powell wrote:
gemini072 wrote:
you can discuss but the group has already defined Ethnicity for this forum
3.3.3 ethnicity — “A group of people with a common tradition and a sense of identity that functions as a subgroup within the larger society; membership is a matter of self-identification.” [Robert F. McNergney and Joanne M. Herbert, Foundations of Education: The Challenge of Professional Practice, 3rd ed. (Boston, 2001), 549.] Synonym: ethnic self-identity. The two essential elements of ethnicity are its positioning within a hegemony and its voluntary nature. First, ethnicity denotes a group’s self-identity within a larger mainstream culture. It does not refer to mainstream national cultures themselves. For example, the customs, traditions, language, and folklore of Spaniards living in Spain are not an ethnicity; they are a national culture. But the rhetoric of unity expressed by Spanish-Americans and their descendants in the United States is an ethnicity. Second, membership in an ethnic community is voluntary and not genetically predetermined. For example, about five percent of the members of the African-American ethnic community have no detectable sub-Saharan DNA admixture, while about thirty percent of the members of the U.S. White endogamous group do have detectable sub-Saharan DNA admixture.
Second, membership in an ethnic community is voluntary and not genetically predetermined.
Of course, Americans are told almost every day by some columnist, reporter, interviewee, teacher, etc. that any "drop of black blood" makes a person in the U.S. "black." That contradicts the above, because the "membership" claimed is involuntary.
This is true. I think that is why people need to be open in understanding that ethnic customs, mannerisms, heritage can don't define and individual, and also that a person (biracial) multiracial mixed can have combinations of ethnic heritage passed down to them.
Most people are brought up in a home where ethnic heritage is passed down. Of course that varies, depending on the environment. a person adopted into a home of people who are not of their 'ethnic heritage' will be brought up with a vary different ethnic outlook as well if they know what they are or where they come from may pull into their lives ethnic customs or mannerisms of the group of people they originate from as well as the adopted culture.
Ashley Judd is sort of an example of that. born:Ashley Tyler Ciminella She grew up in a non Italian environment (her father is Italian) yet along with her specifical Southern heritage she began connecting with Italian heritage. Even marrying an European Italian race car driver from Sweden
Dario Franchitti
She dated Robert De Niro...the only non black?
I always wondered why she looked so different: skin hair texture ... overall looks.