Marilyn Halter, Between Race and Ethnicity: Cape Verdean American Immigrants, 1860-1965 (Urbana: University of Illinois, 1993), xix, 213 , [8] of plates, bibliographical references (p. 187-207), index.
According to Halter, the descendants of immigrants from the Cape Verde islands, “represent the only major community of Americans of African descent (albeit of mixed ancestry) to have voluntarily made the transatlantic voyage to the United States.” (p. 1) The book sheds light on the immigration history and traditions of this ethnic group. Its focus is on the group solidarity that supported members’ self-identity as being Cape Verdeans of Portuguese culture and Roman Catholic religion, and only incidentally as enjoying a wide range of Afro-European genetic admixture. Halter contrasts this self-image with the American perception that these immigrants were simply Black, even the blonde, fair-skinned ones. The book comprises five chapters plus an introduction.
The first chapter describes the author’s methodology of tracing immigration through passenger-ship manifests. The major challenge that she faced was that census and immigration records seldom record the Verdean presence. Although nearly 20,000 Verdeans came to New Bedford between 1890 and 1924 (when immigration became forbidden), they are invisible in the official records. Some contemporary government records put them down as “Portuguese” arrivals, since the Cape Verde archipelago was a Portuguese possession until 1975, and do not capture the immigrants’ wide-ranging “racial” appearance. This conflates their data with immigrants from Portugal. Other official documents of the time record them as, simply “black,” with no record of their ethnicity, thus lumping them in with Africans. The authorÂ’s solution was based on the discovery that hundreds of passenger manifests from the ships that brought the Verdeans have survived. Halter has thereby revealed the true size and demographics of this wave of immigration.
The second chapter narrates the history and background of the Verdean immigration. The islands were uninhabited until the Portuguese landed in the mid-1400s because they lack sufficient rainfall for crops. Portugal used the islands as a staging area for the slave trade and also tried (and failed) to establish a slave-labor plantation economy. As in other Iberian colonies, Verdean slaves were often manumitted as reward for good behavior and routinely freed by upon their master’s death. As in other Iberian colonies, there was little stigma attached to having slave ancestry and so the islands quickly developed a large and socially active population of former slave descendants. As in other Iberian colonies, there was no endogamous color line and so within a few generations the population developed the bell-shaped phenotype distribution typical of former Iberian colonies, where a few individuals look African, a similar fraction look European, and the great majority have an appearance somewhere in-between, their “race” being in the eye (or the ideology) of the beholder.
Portugal essentially abandoned the colony when the slave trade collapsed. The arid climate caused regular crop failures and, for generations, the islands were periodically swept by deadly famines. Then, in the 1880s, whaling ships out of New Bedford began stopping in the islands to replenish and they often hired locals as seamen. When the men returned home after their voyages, they told of New Bedford as a place where people could survive, even make a living. This sparked a 30-year stream of immigration that resulted in Massachusetts’ Verdean ethnic group.
Chapter three describes life and work in the rural cranberry industry, the migrant-laborer niche into which most Verdean immigrants fell. Chapter four tells of the relatively fewer Verdeans who moved into the cities and found work in textile mills.
Despite the book’s title (which implies an end in 1965), its final chapter tells how the Verdean community was finally split into mutually endogamous Black and White branches consequent to the 1965-75 militant Black Power movement. The White branch became accepted as of Portuguese ethnicity; the Blacks were absorbed into the African-American ethnic community.
On the plus side, Halter rightly directs attention to patterns of intermarriage as the bellwether of social acceptance. For most of their history, the Verdeans were strongly endogamous, even showing marriage preference for spouses from the same island of the archipelago. Out-marriage from the group, when it happened, was almost invariably with a spouse of Portuguese ethnicity—never with U.S. Blacks or Whites. “Marriage to an American Black at that time often meant social isolation from family and friends. ... ‘Sometimes Cape Verdean men married Azorean women. The women would be assimilated. After a while you’d forget they were from the Azores.’” [p. 84]
To me, Halter’s most insightful and revealing finding is the gendering of the Verdeans’ socially channeled nostalgia. The music, dance, poetry, and literature of Verdean culture focused on longing for the homeland, the beauty of the islands that they left behind. The sentiment was evidently authentic. When Verdean men retired, they often bought property in the islands, to live out their twilight years and eventually to be buried there. What is interesting is that Halter finds that female traditions, in letters, diaries, and personal interviews, as well as more formal literary modes, flatly contradicted the male longing. Most women, it seems, were glad to be rid of a place where so many children starved during the periodic famines.
A very minor quibble that I have is Halter’s questionable translation of a line from the morna (nostalgic folksong) “Nha Destino.” The original verse (in Verdean Crioulo) is:
Bai terra longe/
É distino di home/
É distino sem nome/
Qui no tem qui cumpri.
In classical Portugese, this would be:
Vai [Ir] longe da terra/
É destino do homen/
É destino sem nome /
Que nos temos que cumprir.
In English, this would be:
To go far from one’s land/
Is the destiny of a man/
It is the nameless fate/
That we must all obey.
Halter translates the stanza as “It is a Cape Verdean destiny to go far away from
his land [italics Halter’s].” She says that, “by implication, what is being left is female.” While I agree that the verse is strongly gendered, to mistranslate “E distino di home” as “his land” rather than “the destiny of a man” weakens the very point she is trying to make.
I have a more serious reservation towards one of Halter’s conclusions. Her evidence shows that, for decades, White society tried to split the Verdeans into White and Black, presumably so that they could be assimilated into the corresponding U.S. endogamous groups. Despite government coercion, this effort failed and the group remained strong. Her evidence also shows that increasing Black violence demanding the assimilation of dark Verdeans into the African-American community accomplished in a few years what White society had failed to do over generations. From this evidence Halter concludes that it was White society that split the Verdeans.
My final complaint is that the book offers little causal analysis of the splitting of Verdean multiracial self-identity into Black and White. Why did this group withstand constant social pressure and repeated government enforcement of the U.S. endogamous color line for nearly a century before finally caving in? As mentioned, halter suggests that the 1965-75 Black Power phase of the civil rights movement was the final blow. But this simply raises several questions. Compare the Verdeans with similar groups: Why did Verdean multiracial ethnic solidarity not collapse into Black and White during the Jim Crow era, as happened to the Louisiana Creoles? Why did it not resist splitting until the 1980s, as with the Ramapo Mountain people. Why is it not coming unglued before our very eyes even as we speak, as with Caribbean Hispanics? For that matter, why did it not continue to survive to this day, as strong as ever, as with the North Carolina Lumbees or the Tennessee Melungeons? Of course, these were not questions that Halter set out to answer. What she set out to do was uncover the facts about a previously invisible multiracial ethnic group, a task that she accomplishes very well indeed. Comparative analysis of why some multiracial ethnicities survive intact while others split into Black and White, remains neglected.
All in all, this is an interesting and useful book about a little-known multiracial ethnicity. It belongs on the shelf next to:
- Karen I. Blu, The Lumbee Problem: The Making of an American Indian People (Cambridge UK: Cambridge University, 1980)
- David Steven Cohen, The Ramapo Mountain People (New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University, 1974)
- N. Brent Kennedy, The Melungeons, The Resurrection of a Proud People: An Untold Story of Ethnic Cleansing in America (Macon: Mercer University, 1997)
- Don C. Marler, Redbones of Louisiana (Hemphill TX: Dogwood, 2003)
- Wayne Winkler, Walking Toward the Sunset: The Melungeons of Appalachia (Macon GA: Mercer University, 2004)