sagascend wrote:
gemini072 wrote:
No that has nothing to do with it, A person is mixed period, you don't have to look unmistakenly like some other ethnic group to be mixed. 2 mulattoes can have children and those children can mixed with other mulattoes and most likely the family will still look part black part white. If you put Lenny Kravitz Boris Kodjoe Rachael True Mariah Carey / Vanesse Williams Jada Pinkett Sinbad Michael Ealy all on an island, generations later the kids will still look like the above mentioned. They will still have very visible features from Africa & Europe.
The ODR did not force mulattoes to live among blacks. And the slave quarters don't count.
There is a rapper named Eric Sermon he is dark skinned and has green eyes(natural) no one is going to tell me that isn't exotic, that he doesn't look mixed nor that the eye color isn't obviously from Europe or white admixture.
You're so right to emphasize the multigenerational view of this issue. So many Blacks are mixed because of the genetic diversity within the population, definitely brought about in large part by the ODR. But to negate the cultural and kinship ties that resulted from the color line/ODR is not only insulting, but quite disingenous. Whenever a poster attempts to liken the participation of visibly mixed Blacks in their culture (not Creoles or folks with their own cultures, but African American/Negro/Colored/BLACK people) as "hostages" it is unbelievably dishonest. I could see if someone was applying a Latin definition of identity, which is based on appearance rather than ancestry. It is one thing to say that there are Black mulattos, blancos, pardos, zambos etc. etc. within the population and quite another to say that these people who
self-identify as Blacks, who were
raised in Black families and
partake in Black culture are frauds, delusional, hostages, or victims. It is one thing to offer an alternative choice in self-identification to mixed people and quite another to do so by denying that kinship bonds over generations have blurred the lines between the Blacks folks want to claim and the Blacks they'd rather not. I can see such activists all over my fairskinned, green eyed uncle like a cheap suit and looking at my more African looking father and saying "eh, no thanks." Makes you wonder what the agenda really is. My sense is that many wish to create a group based on visbile Afro-Euro mixture, with certain phenotypes of mixed individuals becoming highly desirable and others best relegated to "blackness."
I agree with this - basically, you cannot separate a family/siblings by saying some are mixed and others (dark) are unmixed. Due to slavery, ODR, etc AAs/Black Americans come in a variety of shades and often all in the same family. Despite looks, most of these people share the same habits, culture, identity, language, etc. Futhermore, many, if not most Americans are 'mixed' so 'Mixed', in a racial sense, IMO, in our American culture is meaningless (nice trivia, etc.)
That is why my opinion is that offical/legal 'mixedness' as a separate
non-Black status/cateogory be reserved for RECENT mixes
only and for those who do not look part-Black. The Heather Locklear's, Wentworth Miller's, Carol Channings, etc.
Most bi-racials will at least acknowledge their African/Black parent/ancestry and for most they don't even have to - it is obvious via
eyeballing. In my experience, SSA's would NEVER claim these people (White/Hispanic Quads) like Black Amercans can 'justifabily'
claim mulattoes BY CULTURE (and 1 or 2 features).
So, IMO, to solve the 'Who is mixed debate?' Quadroons (
<25% SSA) should not be labeled Black/AA by ANYONE because just about everyone/most mixed people above that level of SSA decent will look part Afro-descente and be subject to ODResque descrimination by many Americans/our culture. IMO, Quads more than anyone are in a 'racial no mans land'. I remeber reading about Mariah Carey (Mulatto who looks
Quadesque) saying she felt invisible and that was the reasoning behind one of her songs (that dealt w/race isses).
Yes, its not fair, but our current American reality (and reality does change

). As a 'mulatto' I claim being biracial, but it is obvious I have recent SSA ancestry, so that puts me in the 'Black' label for many American people. And for those who cannot tell, if asked, I tell them. And no, not all 'Whites' et al. are racist, some have even pushed me to call myself mixed/non-Black, but I am part of AAs
culturally.
Most 'Light-Skinned Blacks' even most Creoles, do not look totally non-Black so that shuts the door on any arguement about phenotype. Only some Creoles approximate this level of Whiteness/Non-Blackness without having RECENT admixure and these Creoles/VLSBs (i.e Broyard-types) are gradually dying out/being eliminated via intermarriage (w/ 'Whites' & 'Blacks'). And most AAs, I would imagine, would claim a person (esp against their will) with 3 non-Black (identifed) grandparents, Dr. Gates notwithstanding.....
