The Study of Racialism

My question is what is the genetic advantage to having a shorter or long pee-pee


Some stereotypes are true. When I lived in China, I had to shower in a big room in the dorms with a lot of foreign students (many Korean, some Japanese, and a few French guys)...yes size differences are real. Life is what it is. These are just averages, and whenever we talk about averages we also have to think about variance, that is very important.



http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_RH ... elines.pdf

on pg. 65

So, the "myth" is true....That explains the whip appeal so many black men have with other women.

Supposedly average vaginal circumference differs from one population group to another. Females from populations in which the males have a larger penis size on average compared to other populations have vaginal circumferences big enough to accommodate that penis size.

Can't remember where, but I came across some information that the Slavic or Balkan penis is thicker (on average) than the penis of other populations.

G-man:

Average vaginal size does differ, but at least width wise, women can "stretch" overtime without tearing as long as they are properly lubricated. Men can not.

So any woman can fit any larger man overtime, although her first few times might be uncomfortable, it does not work the other way around with men though.

Actually yeah I read that on average black men have longer penises but not necessary wider than Europeans. I would think width would hurt more than length. Slav women usually have wide hips...so I can imagine they have more space in that area.

Women from any population can accomodate any penis size, but men from populations that are smaller than average will have difficulty pleasing a women from a population where the men are larger on average.

Hopefully, with advances in male enhancement technology "small fries" will become giants among men and this won't be a problem.

Yeah I can imagine that average Japanese guy is not going to be pleasing to the average Mandingo woman.

I could see it now! "What is that? My 5 year old son is bigger than that, get the heck out of here!!"

What an awkward discussion.



Assuming they could communicate and he was able to woo her, I would beg to differ. That is if she hasn't been subject to FGM. Past the first couple inches the vagina isn't very sensitive.

And since you have the avatar up and you started the thread, I can't resist telling you what I hope you already know. Women don't enjoy forceful contact with their cervix

I can't believe I wrote this.

Oh and to answer your question, the advantage to longer is the little 23x's and 23y's have less of a swim if the delivery module is longer. Perhaps one also attracts more female attention or intimidates other males if one is walking around naked. At some I point I hypothesize too long would make for very awkward relations and have the reverse effect on women and other men as in no way and ha-ha.

No gut crushing here. What I have heard from women is width is more important than length...but in the end most women don't have vaginal orgasms, they have clitoral ones so...

As far as the lenght I guess it is true that more sperm can get put at the cervix if the penis is already there.

I will cite Kon-Fu-Tse (Confusious)

I doesn't matter how long or wide you are; the important is that you can stand :lol:

Or the father of Austin Powels in Goldmember

It does not matter how long it is, but how you use it :D

Jesus! What a topic.

Omar

So I went to the link you provided, and their table on page 62 suggests that blacks and whites in the USA are almost exactly the same, while the guys from thailand, well, um, they'd be better to loose one's virginity to.

Yeah the gap between black and white men is negligable, the gap between Asians and everyone else is big.

It seems on average women prefer more girth than length.

notice, no women commented at all on this thread.

That's because reading this thread is much better than participating, as a woman. Naw..every woman has already or will figure this one out for herself.

All I have to say is this: Might don't make right.

I think in the end it matters little.

If men want to attract women they will worry less about their penis and what they look like and more about their status and cash flow, money and the power that comes with it have been known to attract many a woman where the same man who has little money can not even get a woman to look at him.

Men and women are different, definitely.

I can't count how many times I have seen, especially in developing nations short, fat, middle age, bald men with tall super model like women...the guy usually holding bags from very expensive stores.

You want to make a woman have multiple orgasms, take them to an expensive boutique and drop a $1,000 on them. The last thing she will care about is how long or wide your penis is.

For the sake of anyone offended by this discussion, I would like to point out a few things regarding the document referenced by this thread. According to the chart on page 62, there are significant numbers of Thai men who are more well endowed than the avarage White or Black American man. Futher, the range of variation within geographic/"racial" group is far greater that the difference between the avarage size for each group. Based on this data, guessing the size of any individual based on "race" is likely to be an inaccurate proposition.

My apologies to anyone I offended.

Oh I already knew that. That is why I did not make assumptions. I would even hazard a guess that other population indexes like height, nutrition, etc will play a factor as well. Sure there are population differences because of genetics, but they hardly divide into cute racial ones. I doubt anyone on this board was offended personally. But offended for the sake of others, in this case. I know many Asian men on interracial forums and organizations happily involved with African American women who would have probably been offended by the flippant manner of this thread.

Its funny how you are so offended for others, and the initial reasons I found out about this was an e-mail from my friend works at the World Bank who is Japanese male from Japan.

He was not offended just curious.

http://www.angryasianman.com/
http://www.bitterasianmen.com/
http://www.asianweek.com/2000_02_03/fea ... nmale.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01286.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype ... ast_Asians
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype ... uth_Asians
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype ... ral_Asians

Could care less. I could find sites of black men angry if someone use white chalk on a black chalk board...

and...

As I said if someone wants to provide a study showing otherwise or refuting this data as invalid or other such things they are more than welcome...and I believe it would be a good thing tto see more points of view.

I already provided queries about what might be wrong with the studies. As for angry Black men sites. I guess that means they should not complain about racism anymore.